Literature DB >> 15003985

The second peak of the radial artery pressure wave represents aortic systolic pressure in hypertensive and elderly patients.

A L Pauca1, N D Kon, M F O'Rourke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous measurement of ascending aorta and radial artery pressure shows that mean and diastolic pressures (DP) are in close agreement in normotensive adults, while systolic pressures (SP) are not. However, in the aortic pressure wave, a second systolic peak appears with increasing age and increases to represent the SP by age 32 yr, while in the radial artery, a second systolic deflection appears by age 40 yr. We suggest that the second radial systolic wave, sometimes seen during radial arterial pressure monitoring in older hypertensives, represents the aortic SP. We set out to evaluate whether the aortic and radial second systolic peaks agree, and since doubts exist about the agreement between aortic and radial DP in elderly hypertensive patients, we also assessed that relationship.
METHODS: We compared simultaneously recorded radial and aortic pressures from 21 anaesthetized adult patients using identical fluid-filled pressure measuring systems.
CONCLUSIONS: The second radial pressure peak agreed with that in the aorta within a mean of 0.6 (SD 1.5) mm Hg. The difference between DP in the aorta and radial artery was -1.4 (2) mm Hg. The radial-aortic SP and pulse pressure differences were 5.9 (7.6) and 7.3 (7.6) mm Hg, respectively. These results confirm that when the radial artery pressure wave shows a first and second, or only a second systolic shoulder/peak (on the right side of the pressure wave), the second represents the maximal ascending aortic SP, and that the radial and aortic DP are equivalent, even in older hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15003985     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  17 in total

Review 1.  Antihypertensive drugs and central blood pressure.

Authors:  Carmel M McEniery
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Different associations between blood pressure indices and carotid artery damages in a community-based population of China.

Authors:  G Cheng; F Fan; Y Zhang; L Qi; J Jia; Y Liu; L Gao; X Han; Y Yang; Y Huo
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Central pressure should not be used in clinical practice.

Authors:  Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.597

4.  Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Sheng-Yi Lin; An-Hsun Chou; Yung-Fong Tsai; Su-Wei Chang; Min-Wen Yang; Pei-Chi Ting; Chun-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Differential effects of beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists on central and peripheral blood pressure at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  James A Cockburn; Sally E Brett; Antoine Guilcher; Albert Ferro; James M Ritter; Philip J Chowienczyk
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Racial Differences in Relation Between Carotid and Radial Augmentation Index.

Authors:  Jun Sugawara; Hidehiko Komine; Mutsuko Yoshiwaza; Takashi Tarumi; Seiji Maeda; Hirofumi Tanaka
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 0.597

7.  Validation of the new Complior sensor to record pressure signals non-invasively.

Authors:  Benjamin Sztrymf; Frédéric Jacobs; Denis Chemla; Christian Richard; Sandrine C Millasseau
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?

Authors:  Hao-Min Cheng; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Tzung-Dau Wang; Kazuomi Kario; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Yook-Chin Chia; Romeo Divinagracia; Satoshi Hoshide; Huynh Van Minh; Jennifer Nailes; Sungha Park; Jinho Shin; Saulat Siddique; Jorge Sison; Arieska Ann Soenarta; Guru Prasad Sogunuru; Apichard Sukonthasarn; Jam Chin Tay; Boon Wee Teo; Yuda Turana; Narsingh Verma; Yuqing Zhang; Ji-Guang Wang; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Comparison of the Effect of Thiazide Diuretics and Other Antihypertensive Drugs on Central Blood Pressure: Cross-Sectional Analysis Among Nondiabetic Patients.

Authors:  Cristiano S Moura; Stella S Daskalopoulou; Linda E Levesque; Sasha Bernatsky; Michal Abrahamowicz; Meytal A Tsadok; Shadi Rajabi; Louise Pilote
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance.

Authors:  Carmel M McEniery; John R Cockcroft; Mary J Roman; Stanley S Franklin; Ian B Wilkinson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.