Literature DB >> 15001020

Cue reactivity and regulation of food intake.

Chantal Nederkoorn1, Anita Jansen.   

Abstract

A robust finding in eating research is the so-called counterregulation in restrained eaters. This means that while normal subjects eat less during a taste test, after they consumed a preload, restrained eaters consume more. An explanation is that food exposure causes stronger physiological preparatory reactivity in the restrained eaters. This reactivity is experienced as craving and leads to an increased food intake. To test this theory, 46 high and low restrained eaters were exposed to food or soap, while physiological measurements were made. Afterwards, the subjects performed a taste test, during which food intake was secretly measured. Unrestrained eaters showed an increase in heart rate, gastric activity, and saliva during food exposure; however, restrained eaters did not. Gastric activity significantly correlated with food intake. Group or exposure type did not influence food intake. It can be concluded that unrestrained eaters prepared for food intake, whereas the restrained eaters did not. A possible explanation is that restrained eaters used cognitive suppression to block physiological responding, thereby controlling their food intake.

Year:  2002        PMID: 15001020     DOI: 10.1016/s1471-0153(01)00045-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Behav        ISSN: 1471-0153


  17 in total

1.  Relationship between food habituation and reinforcing efficacy of food.

Authors:  Katelyn A Carr; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2011-05-01

2.  Relation of dietary restraint scores to activation of reward-related brain regions in response to food intake, anticipated intake, and food pictures.

Authors:  Kyle S Burger; Eric Stice
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Design and implementation of a study evaluating extinction processes to food cues in obese children: the Intervention for Regulations of Cues Trial (iROC).

Authors:  Kerri N Boutelle; June Liang; Stephanie Knatz; Brittany Matheson; Victoria Risbrough; David Strong; Kyung E Rhee; Michelle G Craske; Nancy Zucker; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Taste manipulation during a food cue-reactivity task: Effects on cue-elicited food craving and subsequent food intake among individuals with overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Lisa J Germeroth; Meredith L Wallace; Michele D Levine
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2019-03-29

5.  Valuing the Diversity of Research Methods to Advance Nutrition Science.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes; Sylvia B Rowe; Sarah D Ohlhorst; Andrew W Brown; Daniel J Hoffman; DeAnn J Liska; Edith J M Feskens; Jaapna Dhillon; Katherine L Tucker; Leonard H Epstein; Lynnette M Neufeld; Michael Kelley; Naomi K Fukagawa; Roger A Sunde; Steven H Zeisel; Anthony J Basile; Laura E Borth; Emahlea Jackson
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.567

Review 6.  Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Rebecca G Boswell; Hedy Kober
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 9.213

7.  Effects of the modern food environment on striatal function, cognition and regulation of ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Mary V Burke; Dana M Small
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-03-09

8.  Memorizing fruit: The effect of a fruit memory-game on children's fruit intake.

Authors:  Frans Folkvord; Dimitra Tatiana Anastasiadou; Doeschka Anschütz
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-12-10

Review 9.  Regulating food craving: From mechanisms to interventions.

Authors:  Wendy Sun; Hedy Kober
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-04-13

10.  Consumption Simulations Induce Salivation to Food Cues.

Authors:  Mike Keesman; Henk Aarts; Stefan Vermeent; Michael Häfner; Esther K Papies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.