Literature DB >> 15000543

Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: the case of the regularity effect.

Johannes C Ziegler1, Conrad Perry, Max Coltheart.   

Abstract

Words with irregular spelling-sound correspondences are read aloud more slowly than words with regular spelling-sound correspondences. This so-called regularity effect is modulated by word frequency, with low-frequency words showing larger costs than do high-frequency words. Because French has more regular spelling-to-sound correspondences than English, we expected a different pattern in French than in English. This was indeed the case, since regularity effects were obtained for both high- and low-frequency words in French. We further showed that a French implementation of the dual-route cascaded model could not account for this pattern. In additional simulations, we investigated whether this failure was due to lexical processes being too fast (leaving little time for the nonlexical route to interfere) or nonlexical processes being too slow. The results showed that only speeding up the nonlexical route allowed the model to capture the data. This suggests that the delayed phonology assumption that characterizes nonlexical processing in the original model needs to be abandoned in a more regular orthography.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15000543     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  LEXOP: a lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words.

Authors:  R Peereman; A Content
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-05

2.  A cultural effect on brain function.

Authors:  E Paulesu; E McCrory; F Fazio; L Menoncello; N Brunswick; S F Cappa; M Cotelli; G Cossu; F Corte; M Lorusso; S Pesenti; A Gallagher; D Perani; C Price; C D Frith; U Frith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

Authors:  M Coltheart; K Rastle; C Perry; R Langdon; J Ziegler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Identical words are read differently in different languages.

Authors:  J C Ziegler; C Perry; A M Jacobs; M Braun
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-09

5.  A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading.

Authors:  B Ans; S Carbonnel; S Valdois
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains.

Authors:  D C Plaut; J L McClelland; M S Seidenberg; K Patterson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison.

Authors:  R Frost; L Katz; S Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.

Authors:  L Katz; L B Feldman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Orthographic complexity and word naming in Italian: some words are more transparent than others.

Authors:  Cristina Burani; Laura Barca; Andrew W Ellis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

Review 2.  Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth.

Authors:  Xenia Schmalz; Eva Marinus; Max Coltheart; Anne Castles
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

3.  Cross-alphabet and cross-modal long-term priming in Serbian and English.

Authors:  Jelena Havelka; Jeffrey S Bowers; Dragan Janković
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

4.  Is Oral/Text Reading Fluency a "Bridge" to Reading Comprehension?

Authors:  Young-Suk Grace Kim; Chea Hyeong Park; Richard K Wagner
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response.

Authors:  Urs Maurer; Daniel Brandeis; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 3.759

6.  Phonological codes constrain output of orthographic codes via sublexical and lexical routes in Chinese written production.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Qingfang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Role of the Left Anterior Temporal Lobe for Unpredictable and Complex Mappings in Word Reading.

Authors:  Marilyne Joyal; Simona M Brambati; Robert J Laforce; Maxime Montembeault; Mariem Boukadi; Isabelle Rouleau; Joël Macoir; Sven Joubert; Shirley Fecteau; Maximiliano A Wilson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-05

8.  The impact of second language learning on semantic and nonsemantic first language reading.

Authors:  Chiara Nosarti; Andrea Mechelli; David W Green; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Effects of Orthographic Consistency on Bilingual Reading: Human and Computer Simulation Data.

Authors:  Eraldo Paulesu; Rolando Bonandrini; Laura Zapparoli; Cristina Rupani; Cristina Mapelli; Fulvia Tassini; Pietro Schenone; Gabriella Bottini; Conrad Perry; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.