Literature DB >> 10220228

Corticospinal excitability modulation to hand muscles during movement imagery.

P M Rossini1, S Rossi, P Pasqualetti, F Tecchio.   

Abstract

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to magnetic transcranial stimulation (TCS) were recorded from right abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles, sharing the same peripheral innervation but engaged in two different motor demands. In seven healthy and trained subjects, the latencies, amplitudes and variability of MEPs were investigated under the following, randomly intermingled, conditions: full muscular and mental relaxation; mental simulation of selective index finger or little finger abduction; mental non-motor activity (arithmetical calculation); and real motor task (little and index finger abduction). The whole procedure was performed by continuous audiovisual monitoring of electromyographic 'silence' in the tested muscles. The maximal facilitatory effects (= latency shortening and amplitude increase) on MEPs were induced by the real motor task. An amplitude potentiation of MEPs in both tested muscles was present during non-motor mental activity, in comparison to basal values. A further amplitude potentiation, without latency shifts, was confined to the muscle acting as 'prime mover' for the mentally simulated movement, according to the motor program dispatched but not executed by the subject. Similar results were also found in the F-wave, showing that mental simulation affects spinal motoneuronal excitability as well, although -- due to the lack of MEP and F-wave latency shift -- the main effect takes place at cortical level. The study shows that movement imagery can focus specific facilitation on the prime-mover muscle for the mentally simulated movement. This is mainly evident on FDI muscle, which controls fingers (i.e. the index) with highly corticalized motor representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10220228     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/9.2.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  56 in total

1.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition during motor imagery is task-dependent.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Self-selected conscious strategies do not modulate motor cortical output during action observation.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Physical practice induces excitability changes in human hand motor area during motor imagery.

Authors:  Makoto Takahashi; Shikako Hayashi; Zhen Ni; Susumu Yahagi; Marco Favilla; Tatsuya Kasai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The beat goes on: rhythmic modulation of cortical potentials by imagined tapping.

Authors:  Allen Osman; Robert Albert; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Guido Band; Maurits van der Molen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Role of the mirror-neuron system in cross-education.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Glyn Howatson; Endre E Kádár; Jonathan P Farthing; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Motor excitability during imagination and observation of foot dorsiflexions.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Nina Neveling
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Motor cortex excitability changes during imagery of simple reaction time.

Authors:  Hatice Kumru; Oscar Soto; Jordi Casanova; Josep Valls-Sole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Modulation of interhemispheric inhibition by volitional motor activity: an ipsilateral silent period study.

Authors:  Fabio Giovannelli; Alessandra Borgheresi; Fabrizio Balestrieri; Gaetano Zaccara; Maria Pia Viggiano; Massimo Cincotta; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The influence of imagery capacity in motor performance improvement.

Authors:  Célia Ruffino; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Florent Lebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Abnormal motor excitability in patients with psychogenic paresis. A TMS study.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Thomas Hassa; Oliver Tüscher; Roger Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.