Literature DB >> 20685806

Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury.

Maria Dolors Soler1, Hatice Kumru, Raul Pelayo, Joan Vidal, Josep Maria Tormos, Felipe Fregni, Xavier Navarro, Alvaro Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex and techniques of visual illusion, applied isolated or combined, in patients with neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. In a sham controlled, double-blind, parallel group design, 39 patients were randomized into four groups receiving transcranial direct current stimulation with walking visual illusion or with control illusion and sham stimulation with visual illusion or with control illusion. For transcranial direct current stimulation, the anode was placed over the primary motor cortex. Each patient received ten treatment sessions during two consecutive weeks. Clinical assessment was performed before, after the last day of treatment, after 2 and 4 weeks follow-up and after 12 weeks. Clinical assessment included overall pain intensity perception, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and Brief Pain Inventory. The combination of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion reduced the intensity of neuropathic pain significantly more than any of the single interventions. Patients receiving transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion experienced a significant improvement in all pain subtypes, while patients in the transcranial direct current stimulation group showed improvement in continuous and paroxysmal pain, and those in the visual illusion group improved only in continuous pain and dysaesthesias. At 12 weeks after treatment, the combined treatment group still presented significant improvement on the overall pain intensity perception, whereas no improvements were reported in the other three groups. Our results demonstrate that transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion can be effective in the management of neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury, with minimal side effects and with good tolerability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685806      PMCID: PMC2929331          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awq184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  62 in total

Review 1.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; David Liebetanz; Andrea Antal; Nicolas Lang; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Suppl Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003

2.  Referred sensations and neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M D Soler; H Kumru; J Vidal; R Pelayo; J M Tormos; F Fregni; X Navarro; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Sensory profiles: A new strategy for selecting patients in treatment trials for neuropathic pain.

Authors:  G Cruccu; A Truini
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Illusory movements of the paralyzed limb restore motor cortex activity.

Authors:  P Giraux; A Sirigu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Reorganization and preservation of motor control of the brain in spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kristen J Kokotilo; Janice J Eng; Armin Curt
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Types and effectiveness of treatments used by people with chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: influence of pain and psychosocial characteristics.

Authors:  E G Widerström-Noga; D C Turk
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Pain relief by rTMS: differential effect of current flow but no specific action on pain subtypes.

Authors:  N André-Obadia; P Mertens; A Gueguen; R Peyron; L Garcia-Larrea
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Philip J Siddall; Joan M McClelland; Susan B Rutkowski; Michael J Cousins
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Combining observation and imagery of an action enhances human corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Masanori Sakamoto; Tetsuro Muraoka; Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.304

10.  Neuropathic pain and primary somatosensory cortex reorganization following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P J Wrigley; S R Press; S M Gustin; V G Macefield; S C Gandevia; M J Cousins; J W Middleton; L A Henderson; P J Siddall
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  85 in total

Review 1.  Body integrity identity disorder: deranged body processing, right fronto-parietal dysfunction, and phenomenological experience of body incongruity.

Authors:  Melita J Giummarra; John L Bradshaw; Michael E R Nicholls; Leonie M Hilti; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 2.  Developing an optimized strategy with transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance the endogenous pain control system in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Dante Duarte; Luis Eduardo Coutinho Castelo-Branco; Elif Uygur Kucukseymen; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 3.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Beatriz Teixeira Costa; Dante Duarte; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.635

4.  Spinal direct current stimulation modulates the activity of gracile nucleus and primary somatosensory cortex in anaesthetized rats.

Authors:  J Aguilar; F Pulecchi; R Dilena; A Oliviero; A Priori; G Foffani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  [Pain in patients with paraplegia].

Authors:  G Landmann; E-C Chang; W Dumat; A Lutz; R Müller; A Scheel-Sailer; K Schwerzmann; N Sigajew; A Ljutow
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Stefan Leis; Peter Höller; Natasha Thon; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Stefan Golaszewski; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Patients' perspectives on pain.

Authors:  Cecilia Norrbrink; Monika Löfgren; Judith P Hunter; Jaqueline Ellis
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

8.  Virtual reality for the treatment of neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injuries: A scoping review.

Authors:  Philip D Austin; Philip J Siddall
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 9.  Cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury: always for good?

Authors:  K A Moxon; A Oliviero; J Aguilar; G Foffani
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Neuropathic pain post spinal cord injury part 1: systematic review of physical and behavioral treatment.

Authors:  Swati Mehta; Katherine Orenczuk; Amanda McIntyre; Gabrielle Willems; Dalton L Wolfe; Jane T C Hsieh; Christine Short; Eldon Loh; Robert W Teasell
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.