Literature DB >> 14990404

Quantitative analysis of uterosacral ligament origin and insertion points by magnetic resonance imaging.

Wolfgang H Umek1, Daniel M Morgan, James A Ashton-Miller, John O L DeLancey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the percentage of healthy women in whom the uterosacral ligaments are identifiable on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and to determine origin points from the genital tract and insertion points on the pelvic sidewall.
METHODS: Eighty-two asymptomatic women (mean +/- standard deviation age 53 +/- 12 years; mean parity 2.5, range 0-7) volunteered for this study. They were eligible if the most dependent vaginal wall point lay at least 1 cm above the hymenal ring remnant during a Valsalva maneuver. Axial proton density MRI of the entire pelvis was analyzed at 5-mm intervals. All results were referenced to the ischial spine. We determined the visibility of the uterosacral ligaments and located their origins from the genital tract and their insertion points on the pelvic sidewall.
RESULTS: Uterosacral ligaments were visible in 61 (87%) of 70 analyzable scans. They extended over a mean craniocaudal distance of 21 +/- 8 mm (range 10-50). Three regions of origin were found: cervix alone, cervix and vagina in the same section, and vagina alone. Thirty-three percent, 63%, and 4% of 254 identified origin points were from these three areas, respectively. Of 259 uterosacral insertion points, 82% overlaid the sacrospinous ligament/coccygeus muscle complex, 7% the sacrum, and 11% the piriformis muscle, the sciatic foramen, or the ischial spine. Although uterosacral ligament morphology was similar bilaterally, its craniocaudal extent was greater on the right side.
CONCLUSION: In healthy women, the uterosacral ligament origin and insertion points exhibited greater anatomic variation than their name would imply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14990404      PMCID: PMC1226709          DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000113104.22887.cd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  11 in total

1.  A structured system to evaluate urethral support anatomy in magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Q Chou; J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Visibility of pelvic organ support system structures in magnetic resonance images without an endovaginal coil.

Authors:  R Tunn; J O DeLancey; E E Quint
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety.

Authors:  J L Buller; J R Thompson; G W Cundiff; L Krueger Sullivan; M A Schön Ybarra; A E Bent
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Anatomic variations in the levator ani muscle, endopelvic fascia, and urethra in nulliparas evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ralf Tunn; John O l Delancey; Denise Howard; James A Ashton-Miller; Leslie E Quint
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The anatomy and histology of the sacrouterine ligaments.

Authors:  R M CAMPBELL
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Tomographical anatomy of the pelvis, visceral pelvic connective tissue, and its compartments.

Authors:  H Fritsch; H Hötzinger
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  A new look at pelvic relaxation.

Authors:  A C Richardson; J B Lyon; N L Williams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of levator ani morphologic features in different grades of prolapse.

Authors:  Kavita Singh; Marianna Jakab; Wendy M N Reid; Leslie A Berger; Lennox Hoyte
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  21 in total

1.  Simulation of normal pelvic mobilities in building an MRI-validated biomechanical model.

Authors:  Michel Cosson; C Rubod; A Vallet; J F Witz; P Dubois; M Brieu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament.

Authors:  Dzung Vu; Bernard T Haylen; Kelly Tse; Annabelle Farnsworth
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  [The development of concepts of female (in)continence. Pathophysiology, diagnostics and surgical therapy].

Authors:  B Liedl; I Schorsch; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  The role of smooth muscle in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse--an immunohistochemical and morphometric analysis of the cervical third of the uterosacral ligament.

Authors:  Christl Reisenauer; Thomas Shiozawa; Matthias Oppitz; Christian Busch; Andreas Kirschniak; Tanja Fehm; Ulrich Drews
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-10-02

5.  Posterior compartment anatomy as seen in magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional reconstruction from asymptomatic nulliparas.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  3D simulation of pelvic system numerical simulation for a better understanding of the contribution of the uterine ligaments.

Authors:  C Rubod; P Lecomte-Grosbras; M Brieu; G Giraudet; N Betrouni; M Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Cardinal ligament surgical anatomy: cardinal points at hysterectomy.

Authors:  Andrew Samaan; Dzung Vu; Bernard T Haylen; Kelly Tse
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Pregnancy impact on uterosacral ligament and pelvic muscles using a 3D numerical and finite element model: preliminary results.

Authors:  Estelle Jean Dit Gautier; Olivier Mayeur; Julien Lepage; Mathias Brieu; Michel Cosson; Chrystele Rubod
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Cardinal and deep uterosacral ligament lines of action: MRI based 3D technique development and preliminary findings in normal women.

Authors:  Luyun Chen; Rajeev Ramanah; Yvonne Hsu; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  HOXA11 is critical for development and maintenance of uterosacral ligaments and deficient in pelvic prolapse.

Authors:  Kathleen A Connell; Marsha K Guess; Heidi Chen; Vaagn Andikyan; Richard Bercik; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.