Literature DB >> 14988058

Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects.

R L Klatzky1, B McCloskey, S Doherty, J Pellegrino, T Smith.   

Abstract

Our two experiments investigated associations between cognitive representations of objects and hand-shape categories. Hand configurations were partitioned according to prehensility and the size of the contacting surface, resulting in the classes: pinch, poke, palm, and clench. Experiment 1 elicited object names in response to configuration-name cues, provided ratings of the relevance of each configuration to a set of objects, and probed for the functions determining such relevance. Cueing with a configuration class elicited an associated object category with substantial intersubject agreement, and vice versa. Both the object categories and the functions associated with the four hand-configuration classes differed substantially, although the same object could be associated to some extent with multiple configurations, given variations in function. Experiment 2 elicited the names of hand-configuration classes in response to unfamiliar forms, which varied systematically in depth and the size of the projecting picture-plane surface. The modal response, response time, and degree of intersubject agreement were directly related to these variables. These structural variables, however, did not adequately predict shaping responses to real objects, as ascertained from Experiment 1. The results have implications for cognitive representation of motor categories and hand shaping in response to objects.

Year:  1987        PMID: 14988058     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1987.10735407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  15 in total

1.  Emotive concept nouns and motor responses: attraction or repulsion?

Authors:  Laura Freina; Giulia Baroni; Anna M Borghi; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06

2.  The neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke van Mier; Maya Visser; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Postural hand synergies for tool use.

Authors:  M Santello; M Flanders; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Craig S Chapman; Jason P Gallivan; Robert S Mark; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The speed of object recognition from a haptic glance: event-related potential evidence.

Authors:  Ane Gurtubay-Antolin; Borja Rodriguez-Herreros; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Two action systems in the human brain.

Authors:  Ferdinand Binkofski; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Critical brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: a componential analysis.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Allison D Shapiro; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Hands Holding Clues for Object Recognition in Teachable Machines.

Authors:  Kyungjun Lee; Hernisa Kacorri
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2019-05

9.  Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects.

Authors:  R L Klatzky; J Pellegrino; B P McCloskey; S J Lederman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

10.  Uncovering the architecture of action semantics.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.