Literature DB >> 25744887

The speed of object recognition from a haptic glance: event-related potential evidence.

Ane Gurtubay-Antolin1, Borja Rodriguez-Herreros1, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells2.   

Abstract

Recognition of an object usually involves a wide range of sensory inputs. Accumulating evidence shows that first brain responses associated with the visual discrimination of objects emerge around 150 ms, but fewer studies have been devoted to measure the first neural signature of haptic recognition. To investigate the speed of haptic processing, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) during a shape discrimination task without visual information. After a restricted exploratory procedure, participants (n = 27) were instructed to judge whether the touched object corresponded to an expected object whose name had been previously presented in a screen. We encountered that any incongruence between the presented word and the shape of the object evoked a frontocentral negativity starting at ∼175 ms. With the use of source analysis and L2 minimum-norm estimation, the neural sources of this differential activity were located in higher level somatosensory areas and prefrontal regions involved in error monitoring and cognitive control. Our findings reveal that the somatosensory system is able to complete an amount of haptic processing substantial enough to trigger conflict-related responses in medial and prefrontal cortices in <200 ms. The present results show that our haptic system is a fast recognition device closely interlinked with error- and conflict-monitoring processes.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  error monitoring; event-related potentials; haptic object recognition; haptics; tactile object recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25744887      PMCID: PMC4455565          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00836.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  48 in total

1.  A fronto-parietal circuit for tactile object discrimination: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  M Cornelia Stoeckel; Bruno Weder; Ferdinand Binkofski; Giovanni Buccino; N Jon Shah; Rüdiger J Seitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Somatosensory Discrimination of Shape: Tactile Exploration and Cerebral Activation.

Authors:  Rüdiger J. Seitz; Per E. Roland; Christian Bohm; Torgny Greitz; Sharon Stone-Elander
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects.

Authors:  R L Klatzky; B McCloskey; S Doherty; J Pellegrino; T Smith
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update.

Authors:  Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.

Authors:  W H Miltner; C H Braun; M G Coles
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Hierarchical somatosensory processing.

Authors:  Y Iwamura
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Identifying objects from a haptic glance.

Authors:  R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

9.  Impaired tactile learning and retention after removals of the second somatic sensory projection cortex (SII) in the monkey.

Authors:  R M Ridley; G Ettlinger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-06-18       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Neuronal activity in the second somatosensory cortex of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during active touch of gratings.

Authors:  R J Sinclair; H Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Time, touch and temperature affect perceived finger position and ownership in the grasp illusion.

Authors:  Martin E Héroux; Nicolas Bayle; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Interpersonal and intrapersonal entrainment of self-paced tapping rate.

Authors:  Håvard Lorås; Tore Kristian Aune; Rolf Ingvaldsen; Arve Vorland Pedersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.