Literature DB >> 8316092

Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects.

R L Klatzky1, J Pellegrino, B P McCloskey, S J Lederman.   

Abstract

Two studies addressed people's knowledge about the movements underlying functional interactions with objects, when the interactions were described by simple verbal labels expressing environmental goals. In Experiment 1, subjects rated each action with respect to six dimensions: which portion of the limb moved, distance moved, forcefulness, effectors involved, size of the contact surface, and resemblance to grasp. Ratings were systematic and fell on two distinct underlying factors related to limb movement and effector (usually the hand) configuration. In Experiment 2, subjects sorted a subset of the actions by similarity of movement. Clustering and multidimensional scaling solutions indicated that the six initial dimensions contributed to similarity judgments, along with additional parameters. The results support the existence of cognitively accessible, but still relatively specific, representations of functional actions, with potential implications for motor and memory performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8316092     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  Rubbing your stomach while tapping your fingers: interference between motor planning and semantic judgments.

Authors:  B P McCloskey; R L Klatzky; J W Pellegrino
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The prehensile movements of the human hand.

Authors:  J R NAPIER
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1956-11

3.  The timing of natural prehension movements.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects.

Authors:  R L Klatzky; B McCloskey; S Doherty; J Pellegrino; T Smith
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Loci for act recall: contextual influence on the processing of action events.

Authors:  T Helstrup
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1989

6.  Coupling the hand with the handle: an improved notation of touch, grip, and grasp.

Authors:  K H Kroemer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Knowledge of motor commands and the recruitment of human motoneurons.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Motor programme information as a separable memory unit.

Authors:  J Engelkamp; H D Zimmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1984

10.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature?

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Standardized stimuli and procedures for investigating the retrieval of lexical and conceptual knowledge for actions.

Authors:  J A Fiez; D Tranel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

Review 3.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  A perception-based ERP reveals that the magnitude of delay matters for memory-guided reaching.

Authors:  Leanna C Cruikshank; Jeremy B Caplan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Uncovering the architecture of action semantics.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.