Literature DB >> 21037169

Stop what you are not doing! Emotional pictures interfere with the task not to respond.

Jan De Houwer1, Helen Tibboel.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that emotional stimuli interfere with ongoing activities. One explanation is that these stimuli draw attention away from the primary task and thereby hamper the correct execution of the task. Another explanation is that emotional stimuli cause a temporary freezing of all ongoing activity. We used a go/no-go task to differentiate between these accounts. According to the attention account, emotional distractors should impair performance on both go and no-go trials. According to the freezing account, the presentation of emotional stimuli should be detrimental to performance on go trials, but beneficial for performance on no-go trials. Our findings confirm the former prediction: Pictures high in emotional arousal impaired performance on no-go trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21037169     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass.

Authors:  A Ohman; A Flykt; F Esteves
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-09

2.  A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.

Authors:  Daniel Algom; Eran Chajut; Shlomo Lev
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

3.  Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components.

Authors:  Frank P McKenna; Dinkar Sharma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Attentional interference effects of emotional pictures: threat, negativity, or arousal?

Authors:  Ulrich Schimmack; Douglas Derryberry
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2005-03

5.  Preparedness for action: responding to the snake in the grass.

Authors:  Anders Flykt
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2006

6.  Allocation of spatial attention to emotional stimuli depends upon arousal and not valence.

Authors:  Julia Vogt; Jan De Houwer; Ernst H W Koster; Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2008-12

7.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?

Authors:  E Fox; R Russo; R Bowles; K Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

8.  Freeze or flee? Negative stimuli elicit selective responding.

Authors:  Zachary Estes; Michelle Verges
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-04-22

9.  A freezing-like posture to pictures of mutilation.

Authors:  Tatiana M Azevedo; Eliane Volchan; Luiz A Imbiriba; Erika C Rodrigues; José M Oliveira; Liliam F Oliveira; Luiz G Lutterbach; Claudia D Vargas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-11
View more
  20 in total

1.  Emotional distraction unbalances visual processing.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Investigating the effects of pain observation on approach and withdrawal actions.

Authors:  Carl Michael Galang; Mina Pichtikova; Taryn Sanders; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Exposure to emotionally arousing, contamination-relevant pictorial stimuli interferes with response inhibition: Implication for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Thomas G Adams
Journal:  J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.677

4.  Association learning for emotional harbinger cues: when do previous emotional associations impair and when do they facilitate subsequent learning of new associations?

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Alexandra E Ycaza-Herrera; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-10-07

5.  Putting the brakes on the brakes: negative emotion disrupts cognitive control network functioning and alters subsequent stopping ability.

Authors:  Tara K Patterson; Agatha Lenartowicz; Elliot T Berkman; Danni Ji; Russell A Poldrack; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Caffeine improves left hemisphere processing of positive words.

Authors:  Lars Kuchinke; Vanessa Lux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The influence of emotion on cognitive control: relevance for development and adolescent psychopathology.

Authors:  Sven C Mueller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-25

8.  Valence, arousal, and cognitive control: a voluntary task-switching study.

Authors:  Jelle Demanet; Baptist Liefooghe; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-24

9.  Individual Differences in Heart Rate Variability Predict the Degree of Slowing during Response Inhibition and Initiation in the Presence of Emotional Stimuli.

Authors:  Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Sara Jahfari; Vanessa A van Ast; Merel Kindt; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-31

10.  Alcohol affects the emotional modulation of cognitive control: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Anja S Euser; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.