Literature DB >> 26158068

Segmenting pectoralis muscle on digital mammograms by a Markov random field-maximum a posteriori model.

Mei Ge1, James G Mainprize1, Gordon E Mawdsley1, Martin J Yaffe2.   

Abstract

Accurate and automatic segmentation of the pectoralis muscle is essential in many breast image processing procedures, for example, in the computation of volumetric breast density from digital mammograms. Its segmentation is a difficult task due to the heterogeneity of the region, neighborhood complexities, and shape variability. The segmentation is achieved by pixel classification through a Markov random field (MRF) image model. Using the image intensity feature as observable data and local spatial information as a priori, the posterior distribution is estimated in a stochastic process. With a variable potential component in the energy function, by the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of the labeling image, given the image intensity feature which is assumed to follow a Gaussian distribution, we achieved convergence properties in an appropriate sense by Metropolis sampling the posterior distribution of the selected energy function. By proposing an adjustable spatial constraint, the MRF-MAP model is able to embody the shape requirement and provide the required flexibility for the model parameter fitting process. We demonstrate that accurate and robust segmentation can be achieved for the curving-triangle-shaped pectoralis muscle in the medio-lateral-oblique (MLO) view, and the semielliptic-shaped muscle in cranio-caudal (CC) view digital mammograms. The applicable mammograms can be either "For Processing" or "For Presentation" image formats. The algorithm was developed using 56 MLO-view and 79 CC-view FFDM "For Processing" images, and quantitatively evaluated against a random selection of 122 MLO-view and 173 CC-view FFDM images of both presentation intent types.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gibbs distribution; Markov random field; Metropolis sampling; digital mammogram; maximum a posteriori estimate; pectoralis muscle; segmentation; variable spatial constraint

Year:  2014        PMID: 26158068      PMCID: PMC4478980          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.3.034503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  8 in total

1.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm.

Authors:  Y Zhang; M Brady; S Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms.

Authors:  Sze Man Kwok; Ramachandran Chandrasekhar; Yianni Attikiouzel; Mary T Rickard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.

Authors:  S Geman; D Geman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.

Authors:  Chuan Zhou; Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Julie A Douglas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  S K Kinoshita; P M Azevedo-Marques; R R Pereira; J A H Rodrigues; R M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms.

Authors:  K Santle Camilus; V K Govindan; P S Sathidevi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms.

Authors:  N Karssemeijer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E L Desautels; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.048

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Full-field digital mammography: the '30% rule' and influences on visualisation of the pectoralis major muscle on the craniocaudal view of the breast.

Authors:  Julia Strohbach; Jenny Maree Wilkinson; Kelly Maree Spuur
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-06-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.