OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of different treatment strategies (early versus delayed) on the radiological progression of joint damage during 4 years. Additionally, to determine the effect of treatment strategy on the association of HLA class II alleles and joint damage. METHODS: Progression of radiographic damage and association of radiographic damage and genetic predisposition were compared in two cohorts, one treated according to the delayed treatment strategy (initial treatment with analgesics), the other treated according to the early treatment strategy (treatment with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) chloroquine or sulfasalazine). Radiographic damage was measured by the modified Sharp-van der Heijde method. Genetic predisposition was determined by high resolution HLA-DR and DQ typing. RESULTS: A completers-only analysis of 153 patients (originally 206 patients) in a non-randomised design showed less radiographic progression from 0 to 4 years in the early treatment group (median Sharp progression rate 1.3 points/year, n = 75) than in the delayed treatment group (2.5 points/year, n = 78) (p = 0.03). The progression from 1 to 4 years did not differ significantly between the groups. At 4 years, joint destruction in both groups was positively correlated with the presence of the shared epitope. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of early DMARD treatment on the radiological progression of joint damage is still present at 4 years. However, the rate of joint destruction from 1 to 4 years did not differ between the delayed and early treatment group. Neither the radiographic nor the immunogenetic data suggest that longlasting disease modification has been induced by early treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of different treatment strategies (early versus delayed) on the radiological progression of joint damage during 4 years. Additionally, to determine the effect of treatment strategy on the association of HLA class II alleles and joint damage. METHODS: Progression of radiographic damage and association of radiographic damage and genetic predisposition were compared in two cohorts, one treated according to the delayed treatment strategy (initial treatment with analgesics), the other treated according to the early treatment strategy (treatment with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) chloroquine or sulfasalazine). Radiographic damage was measured by the modified Sharp-van der Heijde method. Genetic predisposition was determined by high resolution HLA-DR and DQ typing. RESULTS: A completers-only analysis of 153 patients (originally 206 patients) in a non-randomised design showed less radiographic progression from 0 to 4 years in the early treatment group (median Sharp progression rate 1.3 points/year, n = 75) than in the delayed treatment group (2.5 points/year, n = 78) (p = 0.03). The progression from 1 to 4 years did not differ significantly between the groups. At 4 years, joint destruction in both groups was positively correlated with the presence of the shared epitope. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of early DMARD treatment on the radiological progression of joint damage is still present at 4 years. However, the rate of joint destruction from 1 to 4 years did not differ between the delayed and early treatment group. Neither the radiographic nor the immunogenetic data suggest that longlasting disease modification has been induced by early treatment.
Authors: L R Lard; H Visser; I Speyer; I E vander Horst-Bruinsma; A H Zwinderman; F C Breedveld; J M Hazes Journal: Am J Med Date: 2001-10-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: T Möttönen; P Hannonen; M Leirisalo-Repo; M Nissilä; H Kautiainen; M Korpela; L Laasonen; H Julkunen; R Luukkainen; K Vuori; L Paimela; H Blåfield; M Hakala; K Ilva; U Yli-Kerttula; K Puolakka; P Järvinen; M Hakola; H Piirainen; J Ahonen; I Pälvimäki; S Forsberg; K Koota; C Friman Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-05-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert B M Landewé; Maarten Boers; Arco C Verhoeven; Rene Westhovens; Mart A F J van de Laar; Harry M Markusse; J Christiaan van Denderen; Marie Louise Westedt; Andre J Peeters; Ben A C Dijkmans; Piet Jacobs; Annelies Boonen; Désirée M F M van der Heijde; Sjef van der Linden Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2002-02
Authors: L R Lard; M Boers; A Verhoeven; K Vos; H Visser; J M W Hazes; A H Zwinderman; G M T Schreuder; F C Breedveld; R R P De Vries; S van der Linden; E Zanelli; T W J Huizinga Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2002-04
Authors: M Calgüneri; S Pay; Z Calişkaner; S Apraş; S Kiraz; I Ertenli; V Cobankara Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 1999 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: B Combe; R Landewe; C Lukas; H D Bolosiu; F Breedveld; M Dougados; P Emery; G Ferraccioli; J M W Hazes; L Klareskog; K Machold; E Martin-Mola; H Nielsen; A Silman; J Smolen; H Yazici Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-01-05 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Haoling H Weng; Veena K Ranganath; Dinesh Khanna; Myungshin Oh; Daniel E Furst; Grace S Park; David A Elashoff; John T Sharp; Richard H Gold; James B Peter; Harold E Paulus Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 4.666