Literature DB >> 9751089

Radiographic outcome of recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: a 19-year study of radiographic progression.

F Wolfe1, J T Sharp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the longitudinal radiographic course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify and quantitate predictors of radiographic progression.
METHODS: This prospective, longitudinal study of radiographic progression and clinical predictors of RA involved 256 patients with RA who were seen within the first 2 years of disease (mean 0.77 years) and were followed up for up to 19 years. Participants underwent a total of 6,278 clinical assessments (mean 24.5) and 934 paired radiographs (mean 3.1, range 2-6). Clinical assessments at every visit included determination of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), grip strength, pain scores, tender joint counts, and anxiety and depression measurements. Regression analyses utilized time-integrated predictors.
RESULTS: Overall, radiographic progression rates, as measured by the summary Sharp scores, appeared constant over the course of RA. The strongest correlate of progression was the time-integrated ESR (rho=0.53). This association grew stronger with time. At 0-5 years, 5-10 years, 10-15 years, and 15-20 years, correlations were 0.40, 0.50, 0.65, and 0.74, respectively, and for the period 10-20 years, the correlation was 0.67. In multivariate models, the mean ESR, mean grip strength, rheumatoid factor positivity, and tender joint count were independent predictors of radiographic progression.
CONCLUSION: Radiographic damage occurs at a constant rate in RA, and is not greater early in RA or reduced later in the course of the illness. Acute-phase reactants are, by far, the strongest determinants of progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9751089     DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199809)41:9<1571::AID-ART7>3.0.CO;2-R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  57 in total

1.  Autoantibodies as predictors of disease.

Authors:  D Leslie; P Lipsky; A L Notkins
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Articular damage in late rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Emel Eksioglu; Reyhan Tuncay; Eda Gurcay; Ajda Bal; Aytul Cakci
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Interpreting radiographic data in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  P A Ory
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  The challenge of following process, damage, and function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical care.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Imaging of the hand and wrist in RA.

Authors:  B Taouli; A Guermazi; K E Sack; H K Genant
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Radiological outcome after four years of early versus delayed treatment strategy in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J van Aken; L R Lard; S le Cessie; J M W Hazes; F C Breedveld; T W J Huizinga
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical care.

Authors:  J S Smolen; D Aletaha
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Dynamic exercises in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A P Anandarajah; E M Schwarz
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Is DAS28-CRP with three and four variables interchangeable in individual patients selected for biological treatment in daily clinical practice?

Authors:  Ole Rintek Madsen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 10.  Sexual dimorphism of RA manifestations: genes, hormones and behavior.

Authors:  William J Kovacs; Nancy J Olsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 20.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.