Literature DB >> 20110517

Equivalent responses to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs initiated at any time during the first 15 months after symptom onset in patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis.

Haoling H Weng1, Veena K Ranganath, Dinesh Khanna, Myungshin Oh, Daniel E Furst, Grace S Park, David A Elashoff, John T Sharp, Richard H Gold, James B Peter, Harold E Paulus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate responses by time to initiation of nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in a DMARD-naive cohort of patients with early seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Subjects were categorized by the time from symptom onset to the first DMARD use (median 5.7 months, range 0.6-15.9). Subjects who started their first DMARD within 5 months of symptom onset were compared to subjects who started after 5 months. Disease Activity Scores (DAS-44) and total Sharp Score (TSS) progression rates were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests; multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for potential covariates. The slope of the least-squares regression line was calculated to estimate the annualized TSS progression rates.
RESULTS: Of 233 RA patients, 76% were female and mean age was 50 (SD 13) years. At DMARD start, DAS-44 was similar in all subsets within the 0.6 to 15 months' duration between symptom onset and DMARD initiation. Erosion scores tended to be higher in those who started DMARD later, but Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores were higher in those who started DMARD earlier. During the 2 years after DMARD initiation, improvements in HAQ-DI and DAS-44 were similar in the various duration subsets, with about 25% ever achieving DAS remission (DAS < 1.6). Radiographic progression tended to be numerically but not statistically more rapid in the earlier subsets.
CONCLUSION: Following initiation of nonbiologic DMARD therapy at various times within 15 months of symptom onset, improvements of DAS-44, HAQ-DI, remission rate, and radiographic progression rate were similar, although higher baseline erosion scores were present in those with later initiation of DMARD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20110517      PMCID: PMC3413376          DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  34 in total

1.  Variability of precision in scoring radiographic abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis by experienced readers.

Authors:  John T Sharp; Frederick Wolfe; Marissa Lassere; Maarten Boers; Désirée Van Der Heijde; Arvi Larsen; Harold Paulus; Rolf Rau; Vibeke Strand
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Retardation of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis by initial aggressive treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: five-year experience from the FIN-RACo study.

Authors:  Markku Korpela; Leena Laasonen; Pekka Hannonen; Hannu Kautiainen; Marjatta Leirisalo-Repo; Markku Hakala; Leena Paimela; Harri Blåfield; Kari Puolakka; Timo Möttönen
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-07

Review 3.  Radiologic assessment as an outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J T Sharp
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1989-02

4.  Methods of scoring the progression of radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlation of radiologic, clinical and laboratory abnormalities.

Authors:  J T Sharp; M D Lidsky; L C Collins; J Moreland
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1971 Nov-Dec

5.  How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  J T Sharp; D Y Young; G B Bluhm; A Brook; A C Brower; M Corbett; J L Decker; H K Genant; J P Gofton; N Goodman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1985-12

6.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1988-03

7.  Dating the "window of therapeutic opportunity" in early rheumatoid arthritis: accuracy of patient recall of arthritis symptom onset.

Authors:  Sogol Amjadi; Sogol Amjadi-Begvand; Dinesh Khanna; Grace S Park; Ken J Bulpitt; Weng Kee Wong; Harold E Paulus
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Classifying structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis as progressive or nonprogressive using a composite definition of joint radiographic change: a preliminary proposal.

Authors:  Harold E Paulus; MyungShin Oh; John T Sharp; Richard H Gold; Weng Kee Wong; Grace S Park; Ken J Bulpitt
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-04

9.  Rheumatoid arthritis: treatment which controls the C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate reduces radiological progression.

Authors:  P T Dawes; P D Fowler; S Clarke; J Fisher; A Lawton; M F Shadforth
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1986-02

10.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis.

Authors:  J F Fries; P Spitz; R G Kraines; H R Holman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1980-02
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J Michelle Kahlenberg; David A Fox
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.907

Review 2.  Pre-RA: Can early diagnosis lead to prevention?

Authors:  Salina Haville; Kevin D Deane
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions in patients with early arthritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis.

Authors:  Claire Immediato Daien; Charlotte Hua; Bernard Combe; Robert Landewe
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2017-01-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.