Literature DB >> 11840436

COBRA combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: long-term structural benefits of a brief intervention.

Robert B M Landewé1, Maarten Boers, Arco C Verhoeven, Rene Westhovens, Mart A F J van de Laar, Harry M Markusse, J Christiaan van Denderen, Marie Louise Westedt, Andre J Peeters, Ben A C Dijkmans, Piet Jacobs, Annelies Boonen, Désirée M F M van der Heijde, Sjef van der Linden.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis (COBRA) trial demonstrated that step-down combination therapy with prednisolone, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine (SSZ) was superior to SSZ monotherapy for suppressing disease activity and radiologic progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The current study was conducted to investigate whether the benefits of COBRA therapy were sustained over time, and to determine which baseline factors could predict outcome.
METHODS: All patients had participated in the 56-week COBRA trial. During followup, they were seen by their own rheumatologists and were also assessed regularly by study nurses; no treatment protocol was specified. Disease activity, radiologic damage, and functional ability were the primary outcome domains. Two independent assessors scored radiographs in sequence according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. Outcomes were analyzed by generalized estimating equations on the basis of intent-to-treat, starting with data obtained at the last visit of the COBRA trial (56 weeks after baseline).
RESULTS: At the beginning of followup, patients in the COBRA group had a significantly lower mean time-averaged 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) and a significantly lower median radiologic damage (Sharp) score compared with those in the SSZ monotherapy group. The functional ability score (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]) was similar in both groups. During the 4-5 year followup period, the time-averaged DAS28 decreased 0.17 points per year in the SSZ group and 0.07 in the COBRA group. The Sharp progression rate was 8.6 points per year in the SSZ group and 5.6 in the COBRA group. After adjustment for differences in treatment and disease activity during followup, the between-group difference in the rate of radiologic progression was 3.7 points per year. The HAQ score did not change significantly over time. Independent baseline predictors of radiologic progression over time (apart from treatment allocation) were rheumatoid factor positivity, Sharp score, and DAS28.
CONCLUSION: An initial 6-month cycle of intensive combination treatment that includes high-dose corticosteroids results in sustained suppression of the rate of radiologic progression in patients with early RA, independent of subsequent antirheumatic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11840436     DOI: 10.1002/art.10083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  125 in total

1.  Follow up studies in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  R Landewé; D van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  [Drug therapy of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  U Arndt; M Rittmeister; B Möller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Influence of glucocorticoids and disease activity on total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Boers; M T Nurmohamed; C J A Doelman; L R Lard; A C Verhoeven; A E Voskuyl; T W J Huizinga; R J van de Stadt; B A C Dijkmans; Sj van der Linden
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Glucocorticoids in the treatment of early and late RA.

Authors:  J W J Bijlsma; M Boers; K G Saag; D E Furst
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Radiological outcome after four years of early versus delayed treatment strategy in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J van Aken; L R Lard; S le Cessie; J M W Hazes; F C Breedveld; T W J Huizinga
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 6.  My treatment approach to rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  John M Davis; Eric L Matteson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  The changing face of rheumatoid arthritis: sustained remission for all?

Authors:  John D Isaacs
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 8.  Sulfasalazine: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Katherine F Croom
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Can rheumatoid arthritis ever cease to exist: a review of various therapeutic modalities to maintain drug-free remission?

Authors:  Di Liu; Na Yuan; Guimei Yu; Ge Song; Yan Chen
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 10.  Efficacy, tolerability and cost effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Michael T Nurmohamed; Ben A C Dijkmans
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.