Literature DB >> 1487104

Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions.

D J Franklin1, M J McCoy, G K Martin, B L Lonsbury-Martin.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions can be used to study cochlear function in an objective and noninvasive manner. These features of emitted responses have stimulated a great deal of investigation into the utility of evoked emissions as clinical tests of hearing. One practical and essential aspect of any clinical measure is the consistency of its result upon repeated testing of the same individual (i.e., its test/retest reliability). The goal of the present work was to conduct a systematic study of the test/retest reliability of the two evoked emission types, the transiently evoked and the distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, that have the greatest promise of becoming clinically useful. Toward this end, the short- and long-term reliabilities of these two response measures were examined in 12 normally hearing adults. The results of these experiments showed that the consistency of both measures of evoked otoacoustic emissions was generally excellent.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1487104     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199212000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  23 in total

1.  Recent advances in the hearing assessment of children.

Authors:  B Katbamna; D R Patel
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Chirp-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Absorbance for Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan; Jeffrey A Gold; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Meta-Analysis of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Retest Variability for Serial Monitoring of Cochlear Function in Adults.

Authors:  Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing Disorders.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Multivariate DPOAE metrics for identifying changes in hearing: perspectives from ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Yeini C Guardia; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel B Putterman; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Angela C Garinis; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Garnett P McMillan; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.