Literature DB >> 1482142

Pharmacodynamics of once-daily amikacin in various combinations with cefepime, aztreonam, and ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro infection model.

B J McGrath1, E M Bailey, K C Lamp, M J Rybak.   

Abstract

The pharmacodynamics of once-daily amikacin administered as monotherapy and in combination with aztreonam, ceftazidime, and cefepime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and clinical isolate 16690 (moderately susceptible to ceftazidime) were investigated with an in vitro model of infection over a 24-h period. Monotherapy with aztreonam, ceftazidime, and cefepime and combinations of aztreonam with cefepime or ceftazidime were also studied. MICs and MBCs were determined for viable organisms at 24 h to test for the development of resistance. Once-daily amikacin demonstrated killing activity over the initial 8 h superior to those of all other drugs administered as monotherapy against both strains tested (P < 0.01). Regrowth by 24 h was greatest for the amikacin regimen (P < 0.01) but was apparent for all monotherapy regimens against both strains. No changes in susceptibilities were observed. All combination therapies containing once-daily amikacin achieved 99.9% reductions in log10 CFU/ml by 2.0 h against both strains, with no regrowth of organisms at 24 h. Aztreonam-cefepime and -ceftazidime combinations required approximately 5 to 6 h to achieve a 99.9% reduction in log10 CFU/ml. Although there was no difference in time to the 99.9% kill between the aztreonam-cefepime and -ceftazidime regimens against either strain, the killing activity of these combinations was significantly less than those of regimens containing once-daily amikacin (P < 0.01). Minor differences in the initial susceptibilities of beta-lactams and the monobactam aztreonam against P. aeruginosa may not be important for therapeutic outcomes when used in combination with single-daily aminoglycoside therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1482142      PMCID: PMC245538          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.36.12.2741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  24 in total

Review 1.  In vivo antibiotic synergism: contribution of animal models.

Authors:  B Fantin; C Carbon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A study of amikacin given once versus twice daily in serious infections.

Authors:  R Maller; B Isaksson; L Nilsson; L Sörén
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  The postantibiotic effect.

Authors:  W A Craig; B Vogelman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in elderly volunteers.

Authors:  M LeBel; G Barbeau; F Vallee; M G Bergeron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A randomized trial comparing ceftazidime alone with combination antibiotic therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia.

Authors:  P A Pizzo; J W Hathorn; J Hiemenz; M Browne; J Commers; D Cotton; J Gress; D Longo; D Marshall; J McKnight
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The influence of tobramycin dosage regimens on nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and antibacterial efficacy in a rat model of subcutaneous abscess.

Authors:  C A Wood; D R Norton; S J Kohlhepp; P W Kohnen; G A Porter; D C Houghton; R E Brummett; W M Bennett; D N Gilbert
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Selection of aminoglycoside-resistant variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vivo model.

Authors:  A U Gerber; A P Vastola; J Brandel; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Once-daily vs. continuous aminoglycoside dosing: efficacy and toxicity in animal and clinical studies of gentamicin, netilmicin, and tobramycin.

Authors:  S H Powell; W L Thompson; M A Luthe; R C Stern; D A Grossniklaus; D D Bloxham; D L Groden; M R Jacobs; A O DiScenna; H A Cash; J D Klinger
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  Ceftazidime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  D M Richards; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Single, large, daily dosing versus intermittent dosing of tobramycin for treating experimental pseudomonas pneumonia.

Authors:  J E Kapusnik; C J Hackbarth; H F Chambers; T Carpenter; M A Sande
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  13 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamics of cefepime alone and in combination with various antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model.

Authors:  Vanthida Huang; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Rationale behind high-dose amoxicillin therapy for acute otitis media due to penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci: support from in vitro pharmacodynamic studies.

Authors:  P D Lister; A Pong; S A Chartrand; C C Sanders
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Amikacin Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis in Pediatric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ali A Alhadab; Mariam A Ahmed; Richard C Brundage
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Development and qualification of a pharmacodynamic model for the pronounced inoculum effect of ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; Neang S Ly; Jenny C Yang; Alan Forrest; William J Jusko; Brian T Tsuji
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Elimination of quinolone antibiotic carryover through use of antibiotic-removal beads.

Authors:  R A Zabinski; A J Larsson; K J Walker; S S Gilliland; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin, alone and in combination with rifampin, against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro infection model.

Authors:  S L Kang; M J Rybak; B J McGrath; G W Kaatz; S M Seo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Improved efficacy with nonsimultaneous administration of first doses of gentamicin and ceftazidime in vitro.

Authors:  M L Barclay; E J Begg; S T Chambers; D R Boswell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Evaluation of activity of temafloxacin against Bacteroides fragilis by an in vitro pharmacodynamic system.

Authors:  R A Zabinski; K Vance-Bryan; A J Krinke; K J Walker; J A Moody; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Bactericidal activities of teicoplanin, vancomycin, and gentamicin alone and in combination against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of endocarditis.

Authors:  B J McGrath; S L Kang; G W Kaatz; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Cefepime-aztreonam: a unique double beta-lactam combination for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  P D Lister; W E Sanders; C C Sanders
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.