Literature DB >> 29358293

Amikacin Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis in Pediatric Cancer Patients.

Ali A Alhadab1, Mariam A Ahmed2, Richard C Brundage1.   

Abstract

We performed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) and simulation analyses to evaluate a standard amikacin dose of 15 mg/kg once daily in children with cancer and to determine an optimal dosing strategy. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed from clinical data collected in 34 pediatric patients and used in a simulation study to predict the population probability of various dosing regimens to achieve accepted safety (steady-state unbound trough plasma concentration [fCmin] of <10 mg/liter)- and efficacy (free, unbound plasma concentration-to-MIC ratio [fCmax/MIC] of ≥8)-linked targets. In addition, an adaptive resistance PD (ARPD) model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was built based on literature time-kill curve data and linked to the PK model to perform PK-ARPD simulations and compare results with those of the probability approach. Using the probability approach, an amikacin dose of 60 mg/kg administered once daily is expected to achieve the target fCmax/MIC in 80% of pediatric patients weighing 8 to 70 kg with a 97.5% probability, and almost all patients were predicted to have fCmin of <10 mg/liter. However, PK-ARPD simulation predicted that 60 mg/kg/day is unlikely to suppress bacterial resistance with repeated dosing. Furthermore, PK-ARPD simulation suggested that amikacin at 90 mg/kg, given in two divided doses (45 mg/kg twice a day), is expected to hit safety and efficacy targets and is associated with a lower rate of bacterial resistance. The disagreement between the two methods is due to the inability of the probability approach to predict development of drug resistance with repeated dosing. This originates from the use of PK-PD indices based on the MIC that neglects measurement errors, ignores the time course dynamic nature of bacterial growth and killing, and incorrectly assumes the MIC to be constant during treatment.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; pediatrics; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29358293      PMCID: PMC5913936          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01781-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  38 in total

1.  Use of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to optimize antimicrobial treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

Authors:  David S Burgess
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  What about confidence intervals? A word of caution when interpreting PTA simulations.

Authors:  Pieter Colin; Douglas J Eleveld; Stijn Jonckheere; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Jan De Waele; An Vermeulen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Bacterial uptake of aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Authors:  H W Taber; J P Mueller; P F Miller; A S Arrow
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1987-12

4.  Nonparametric population pharmacokinetic analysis of amikacin in neonates, infants, and children.

Authors:  J M Tréluyer; Y Merlé; S Tonnelier; E Rey; G Pons
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Use of preclinical data for selection of a phase II/III dose for evernimicin and identification of a preclinical MIC breakpoint.

Authors:  G L Drusano; S L Preston; C Hardalo; R Hare; C Banfield; D Andes; O Vesga; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Integrating pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and MIC distributions to assess changing antimicrobial activity against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing infections in Canadian hospitals (CANWARD).

Authors:  Sheryl A Zelenitsky; Ethan Rubinstein; Robert E Ariano; George G Zhanel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Pharmacodynamic effects of extended dosing intervals of imipenem alone and in combination with amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro model.

Authors:  B J McGrath; K C Lamp; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Amikacin pharmacokinetics in patients receiving high-dose cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  R L Davis; D Lehmann; C A Stidley; J Neidhart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Adaptive resistance following single doses of gentamicin in a dynamic in vitro model.

Authors:  M L Barclay; E J Begg; S T Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  In vitro potency of amikacin and comparators against E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa respiratory and blood isolates.

Authors:  Christina A Sutherland; Jamie E Verastegui; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.944

View more
  4 in total

1.  Semimechanistic Modeling of Eravacycline Pharmacodynamics Using In Vitro Time-Kill Data with MIC Incorporated in an Adaptive Resistance Function.

Authors:  Ken Nguyen; Timothy J Bensman; Xiaohui Tracey Wei; Jason N Moore
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Activities of Cefiderocol with Simulated Human Plasma Concentrations against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli in an In Vitro Chemostat Model.

Authors:  Shuhei Matsumoto; Sachi Kanazawa; Takafumi Sato; Yoshinori Yamano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro and in vivo Effect of Antimicrobial Agent Combinations Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with Different Resistance Mechanisms in China.

Authors:  Enbo Liu; Peiyao Jia; Xue Li; Menglan Zhou; Timothy Kudinha; Chuncai Wu; Yingchun Xu; Qiwen Yang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 4.  Amikacin Therapy in Japanese Pediatric Patients: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Hideo Kato; Yukihiro Hamada
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.