Literature DB >> 15616309

Pharmacodynamics of cefepime alone and in combination with various antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model.

Vanthida Huang1, Michael J Rybak.   

Abstract

Treatment options for gram-positive resistant bacteria are limited; therefore, efforts to evaluate therapy options in the critical care population are warranted. Cefepime has broad-spectrum activity against gram-negative and gram-positive organisms. We have previously demonstrated that the combination of cefepime with vancomycin, linezolid, or quinupristin-dalfopristin had an improved or enhanced effect against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We investigated various regimens of cefepime alone and in combination against two clinical MRSA isolates (R2481 and R2484) in an established in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Human pharmacokinetic regimen simulations were as follows: cefepime, 2 g every 8 h (q8h) (C8) and 12 h (C12), continuous-infusion 2-g loading dose followed by 4 g alone or in combination with gentamicin and tobramycin (1.0 or 2.0 [G1 and G2 or TB1 and TB2] mg/kg of body weight q12h and 5.0 [G5 or TB5] mg/kg q24h), arbekacin (ARB) (100 mg q12h), linezolid (LIN) (600 mg q12h), tigecycline (TIG) (100 mg q24h), or daptomycin (DAP) (6 mg/kg q24h) for 48 h. The MICs for cefepime, gentamicin, tobramycin, ARB, LIN, TIG, and DAP for the two clinical MRSA isolates (R2481 and R2484) were 4 and 4, 0.25 and 0.5, 128 and 0.5, 0.5 and 0.125, 2 and 4, 0.25 and 0.25, and 0.0625 and 0.125 microg/ml, respectively. At 48 h, combinations of C12 and C8 plus ARB, G1, or G5 (range, -2.05- to -4.32-log(10) decrease) demonstrated enhanced lethality against R2481 (resistant to tobramycin) (P < 0.05). A similar relationship was demonstrated against R2484 with cefepime plus ARB, gentamicin, or tobramycin (range, -2.05- to -3.63-log(10) decrease) (P < 0.05). A 99.9% kill was achieved with cefepime plus aminoglycoside combinations as early as 2 h and maintained throughout the 48-h period. TIG was antagonistic when combined with C12 against both isolates. DAP alone achieved 99.9% kill for up to 48 h for both isolates and was the most active agent against R2481 and R2484 (-2.89- and -3.61-log(10) decrease at 48 h); therefore, combination therapy did not enhance lethality. Overall, the most potent combinations noted were cefepime in combination with low- and high-dose aminoglycosides. Further investigations with combination therapies are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15616309      PMCID: PMC538893          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.1.302-308.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  50 in total

1.  Identification of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes by susceptibility testing: epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Japan.

Authors:  T Ida; R Okamoto; C Shimauchi; T Okubo; A Kuga; M Inoue
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Pharmacokinetics and inflammatory fluid penetration of intravenous daptomycin in volunteers.

Authors:  R Wise; T Gee; J M Andrews; B Dvorchik; G Marshall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999.

Authors:  D J Diekema; M A Pfaller; F J Schmitz; J Smayevsky; J Bell; R N Jones; M Beach
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Bactericidal activities of two daptomycin regimens against clinical strains of glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  R L Akins; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Cefepime microbiologic profile and update.

Authors:  R E Kessler
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Mark C Enright; D Ashley Robinson; Gaynor Randle; Edward J Feil; Hajo Grundmann; Brian G Spratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with intermediate glycopeptide resistance: clinical significance and treatment options.

Authors:  M J Rybak; R L Akins
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Optimizing antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit setting.

Authors:  M H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Pharmacodynamic considerations in the treatment of moderate to severe pseudomonal infections with cefepime.

Authors:  Paul G Ambrose; Robert C Owens; Michael J Garvey; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  [Combination effect of arbekacin and cefepime on mixed culture of MRSA and P. aeruginosa].

Authors:  M Araake; T Hara; A Miyata; M Tani; H Ogawa
Journal:  Jpn J Antibiot       Date:  2001-02
View more
  11 in total

1.  Novel daptomycin combinations against daptomycin-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Molly E Steed; Celine Vidaillac; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Short-course gentamicin in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Brian T Tsuji; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pulsatile delivery of clarithromycin alone or in combination with amoxicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Kimberly D Leuthner; Chrissy M Cheung; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Incidence, microbiological findings, and clinical presentation of sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery with and without local gentamicin prophylaxis.

Authors:  O Friberg; R Svedjeholm; J Källman; B Söderquist
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Use of a bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain within an in vitro microbiological system, as a model of wound infection, to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of wound dressings by monitoring light production.

Authors:  R M S Thorn; S M Nelson; J Greenman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Serum and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of linezolid in neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  Pavlos Myrianthefs; Sophia L Markantonis; Konstantinos Vlachos; Maria Anagnostaki; Eleni Boutzouka; Dimitris Panidis; Georgios Baltopoulos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Activity of linezolid in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using different dosages and Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis strains with and without a hypermutator phenotype.

Authors:  Boubakar B Ba; Corinne Arpin; Branly Bikie Bi Nso; Véronique Dubois; Marie-Claude Saux; Claudine Quentin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro evaluation of antibiotics' combinations for empirical therapy of suspected methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus severe respiratory infections.

Authors:  Lorenzo Drago; Elena De Vecchi; Lucia Nicola; Maria Rita Gismondo
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Repurposing Clinical Molecule Ebselen to Combat Drug Resistant Pathogens.

Authors:  Shankar Thangamani; Waleed Younis; Mohamed N Seleem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cefepime- Induced Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (NCSE).

Authors:  Ahro Kim; Ji-Eun Kim; Young-Min Paek; Keun-Sik Hong; Young-Jin Cho; Joong-Yang Cho; Hee-Kyung Park; Hyeon-Kyoung Koo; Pamela Song
Journal:  J Epilepsy Res       Date:  2013-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.