Literature DB >> 14770018

Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.

Winnie Y S Wong1, David R Stapells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The behavioral binaural masking level difference (BMLD) is believed to reflect brain stem processing. However, this conflicts with transient auditory evoked potential research that indicates the auditory brain stem and middle latency responses do not demonstrate the BMLD. The objective of the present study is to investigate the brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the BMLD in humans using the brain stem and cortical auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs).
DESIGN: A 500-Hz pure tone, amplitude-modulated (AM) at 80 Hz and 7 (or 13) Hz, was used to elicit brain stem and cortical ASSRs, respectively. The masker was a 200-Hz-wide noise centered on 500 Hz. Eleven adult subjects with normal hearing were tested. Both ASSR (brain stem and cortical) and behavioral thresholds for diotic AM stimuli (when the signal and noise are in phase binaurally: SoNo) and dichotic AM stimuli (when either the signal or noise is 180 degrees out-of-phase between the two ears: SpiNo, SoNpi) were investigated. ASSR and behavioral BMLDs were obtained by subtracting the threshold for the dichotic stimuli from that for the diotic stimuli, respectively. Effects for modulation rate, signal versus noise phase changes, and behavioral versus ASSR measure on the BMLD were investigated.
RESULTS: Behavioral BMLDs (mean = 8.5 to 10.5 dB) obtained are consistent with results from past research. The ASSR results are similar to the pattern of results previously found for the transient auditory brain stem responses and the N1-P2 cortical auditory evoked potential, in that only the cortical ASSRs (7 or 13 Hz) demonstrate BMLDs (mean = 5.8 dB); the brain stem ASSRs (80 Hz) (mean = 1.5 dB) do not. The ASSR results differ from the previous transient N1-P2 studies, however, in that the cortical ASSRs show a BMLD only when there is a change in the signal interaural phase, but not for changes of noise interaural phase.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that brain processes underlying the BMLD occur either in a different pathway or beyond the brain stem auditory processing underlying the 80-Hz ASSR. Results also suggest that the cortical ASSRs have somewhat different neural sources than the transient N1-P2 responses, and that they may reflect the output of neural populations that previous research has shown to be insensitive to binaural differences in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14770018     DOI: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000111257.11898.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  15 in total

1.  Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Robert Ellis; Julie Mehta; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory steady-state responses to monaural and diotic stimulation.

Authors:  Hanne Poelmans; Heleen Luts; Maaike Vandermosten; Pol Ghesquière; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-28

3.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

4.  Comparison of two cortical measures of binaural hearing acuity.

Authors:  Won So; Spencer B Smith
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Chandan H Suresh; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  No counterpart of visual perceptual echoes in the auditory system.

Authors:  Barkın İlhan; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Effects of degraded speech processing and binaural unmasking investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Gabriel S Sobczak; Colette M McKay; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Functional anatomy of the masking level difference, an fMRI study.

Authors:  David S Wack; Jennifer L Cox; Claudiu V Schirda; Christopher R Magnano; Joan E Sussman; Donald Henderson; Robert F Burkard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neural representation of scale illusion: magnetoencephalographic study on the auditory illusion induced by distinctive tone sequences in the two ears.

Authors:  Shinya Kuriki; Koichi Yokosawa; Makoto Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.