Literature DB >> 17103326

Phonological assimilation and visual word recognition.

Yang Lee1, Miguel A Moreno, Hyeongsaeng Park, Claudia Carello, Michael T Turvey.   

Abstract

Are the visual word-processing tasks of naming and lexical decision sensitive to systematic phonological properties that may or may not be specified in the spelling? Two experiments with Hangul, the alphabetic orthography of Korea, were directed at the effects of the phonological process of assimilation whereby one articulation changes to conform to a neighboring articulation. Disyllabic words were responded to more quickly when (a) the final letter of the first syllable and the initial letter of the second syllable specified phonemes that satisfied rather than violated consonant assimilation, and (b) the vowel letters specified harmonious as opposed to disharmonious vowel phonemes. Discussion addressed the possible mediation of assimilation effects by consistency differences and theories that predict broad phonological influences on visual word recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17103326     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-006-9027-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  10 in total

1.  Identity priming in English is compromised by phonological ambiguity.

Authors:  G Lukatela; S J Frost; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Reading homographs: orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics.

Authors:  L R Gottlob; S D Goldinger; G O Stone; G C Van Orden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Vowel duration affects visual word identification: evidence that the mediating phonology is phonetically informed.

Authors:  Georgije Lukatela; Thomas Eaton; Laura Sabadini; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; B F Pennington; G O Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Reading in two alphabets.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1998-09

6.  When nonwords activate semantics better than words.

Authors:  G Lukatela; C Carello; M Savić; Z Urosević; M T Turvey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

Review 7.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails.

Authors:  R Frost
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, learning, and resonance.

Authors:  S Grossberg; G Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; S D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Whole Language vs. Code Emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction.

Authors:  I Y Liberman; A M Liberman
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1990-01
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Do phonological constraints on the spoken word affect visual lexical decision?

Authors:  Yang Lee; Miguel A Moreno; Claudia Carello; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.