Literature DB >> 14767755

Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists?

Sarah C Richardson1.   

Abstract

As "exploiters" of plant-pollinator mutualisms, nectar-robbers remove rewards (nectar) without providing pollination services. Though one might expect nectar-robbing to be costly to plants, it may instead benefit plants by indirectly increasing pollen dispersal. I investigated the direct effects of nectar-robbing bees ( Xylocopa californica) on floral rewards and behaviors of pollinators visiting desert willow ( Chilopsis linearis) and indirect effects of robbing on the reproductive success of the plant. Nectar-robbers reduced nectar; while unrobbed and robbed flowers were equally likely to contain nectar, nectar volumes were smaller in robbed flowers with nectar. Apis mellifera (honeybees), ineffective pollinators in terms of pollen deposition, avoided robbed flowers. In contrast, Bombus sonorus (bumblebees), effective pollinators, did not avoid robbed flowers. While bumblebees tended to spend less time in robbed flowers, the time that they spent in flowers was not correlated with pollen deposition. Using powder mimicking pollen, I found that on some days, powder was dispersed farther or to more flowers from robbed flowers, indicating that robbing may sometimes benefit plants by increasing male reproductive success. Powder movement suggested that the effect of robbing on male reproductive success ranged from costly to beneficial. The outcome for flowers that were marked early each morning was a function of prevalence of robbing and abundances of effective pollinators, but not a function of spatial variability among trees in prevalence of robbing or the abundance of ineffective honeybees. Unlike powder dispersal, female reproductive success, measured by fruit set and the number of pollen tubes growing in styles, was not affected by robbing. Thus, robbers did not reduce plants' female reproductive success either directly by damaging flowers or indirectly by reducing pollen deposition by pollinators. Overall, this study indicates that nectar-robbers were not often costly to plants, and sometimes even benefited plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14767755     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1504-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions.

Authors:  J L Bronstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin; Joan E Maloof
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Comparative studies of pollen and fluorescent dye transport by bumble bees visiting Erythronium grandiflorum.

Authors:  James D Thomson; Mary V Price; Nickolas M Waser; Donald A Stratton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin; Alison K Brody; Nickolas M Waser
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Iridoid glycosides in the nectar ofCatalpa speciosa are unpalatable to nectar thieves.

Authors:  A G Stephenson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Preferential nectar robbing of flowers with long corollas: experimental studies of two hummingbird species visiting three plant species.

Authors:  Carlos Lara; Juan Ornelas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata : effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin; Alison K Brody
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  GENE FLOW IN CHAMAECRISTA FASCICULATA (LEGUMINOSAE) I. GENE DISPERSAL.

Authors:  Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Coevolution of foraging in bombus and nectar dispensing in chilopsis: a last dreg theory.

Authors:  T G Whitham
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Non-mutualistic yucca moths and their evolutionary consequences.

Authors:  O Pellmyr; J Leebens-Mack; C J Huth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  Wind-dragged corolla enhances self-pollination: a new mechanism of delayed self-pollination.

Authors:  Rongming Qu; Xiaojie Li; Yibo Luo; Ming Dong; Huanli Xu; Xuan Chen; Amots Dafni
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  The roles of tolerance in the evolution, maintenance and breakdown of mutualism.

Authors:  David P Edwards
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-05-30

3.  Nectar replenishment maintains the neutral effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive success of Salvia przewalskii (Lamiaceae), a plant pollinated and robbed by bumble bees.

Authors:  Zhong-Ming Ye; Xiao-Fang Jin; Qing-Feng Wang; Chun-Feng Yang; David W Inouye
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Effects of nectar robbing on male and female reproductive success of a pollinator-dependent plant.

Authors:  Sandra V Rojas-Nossa; José María Sánchez; Luis Navarro
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Asymmetric competition for nectar between a large nectar thief and a small pollinator: an energetic point of view.

Authors:  Eliška Padyšáková; Jan Okrouhlík; Mark Brown; Michael Bartoš; Štěpán Janeček
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Differential effects of nectar robbing by the same bumble-bee species on three sympatric Corydalis species with varied mating systems.

Authors:  Yan-Wen Zhang; Qian Yu; Ji-Min Zhao; You-Hao Guo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Floral nectar guide patterns discourage nectar robbing by bumble bees.

Authors:  Anne S Leonard; Joshua Brent; Daniel R Papaj; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of Striped-Squirrel Nectar-Robbing Behaviour on Gender Fitness in Alpinia roxburghii Sweet (Zingiberaceae).

Authors:  Xiaobao Deng; Dharmalingam Mohandass; Masatoshi Katabuchi; Alice C Hughes; David W Roubik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does Plant Origin Influence the Fitness Impact of Flower Damage? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Catalina González-Browne; Maureen M Murúa; Luis Navarro; Rodrigo Medel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nectar robbing positively influences the reproductive success of Tecomella undulata (Bignoniaceae).

Authors:  Vineet Kumar Singh; Chandan Barman; Rajesh Tandon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.