Literature DB >> 28466170

Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species.

Rebecca E Irwin1,2, Joan E Maloof3,4.   

Abstract

Spatiotemporal variation in the interactions among plants and animals is widespread; yet our conceptual and empirical understanding of this variation is limited to a few types of visitors, mainly herbivores, pollinators, seed predators, and seed dispersers. Despite the ubiquity of nectar robbing and the strength of its effects on plant fitness, we know relatively little about the magnitude and intensity of spatial and temporal variation in interactions among plants and nectar robbers. The purpose of the present study was to quantify spatial and temporal variation in the interactions between a nectar-robbing bumblebee and its host plants. In the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, USA, over 7 years, and multiple locations, we measured levels of nectar robbing by the bumblebee Bombus occidentalis and its interactions with four different host plants, Delphinium nuttallianum (Ranunculaceae), Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae), Corydalis caseana (Fumariaceae), and Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). Significant variation was found in the robbing rates experienced by different species. Within species, there was variation in robbing rates on an annual basis, on a seasonal basis, among different sites, and within sites. This variation may have important consequences with respect to the population dynamics of host plants as well as selection on floral and flowering traits. Electronic supplementary material is available if you access this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1060-z. On that page (frame on the left side), a link takes you directly to the supplementary materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus occidentalis; Floral larceny; Plant-animal interactions; Spatiotemporal variation

Year:  2002        PMID: 28466170     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1060-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Generous-like flowers: nectar production in two epiphytic bromeliads and a meta-analysis of removal effects.

Authors:  Mariano Ordano; Juan Francisco Ornelas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Interactions between nectar robbers and seed predators mediated by a shared host plant, Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  Alison K Brody; Rebecca E Irwin; Meghan L McCutcheon; Emily C Parsons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Selection on spur shape in Impatiens capensis.

Authors:  Helen J Young
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Nectar replenishment maintains the neutral effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive success of Salvia przewalskii (Lamiaceae), a plant pollinated and robbed by bumble bees.

Authors:  Zhong-Ming Ye; Xiao-Fang Jin; Qing-Feng Wang; Chun-Feng Yang; David W Inouye
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Effects of nectar robbing on male and female reproductive success of a pollinator-dependent plant.

Authors:  Sandra V Rojas-Nossa; José María Sánchez; Luis Navarro
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Nectar robbers pollinate flowers with sexual organs hidden within corollas in distylous Primula secundiflora (Primulaceae).

Authors:  Xing-Fu Zhu; Jin-Peng Wan; Qing-Jun Li
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  The Campsis-Icterus association as a model system for avian nectar-robbery studies.

Authors:  Gary R Graves
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists?

Authors:  Sarah C Richardson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Immediate effects of nectar robbing by Palestine sunbirds (Nectarinia osea) on nectar alkaloid concentrations in tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca).

Authors:  Rainee L Kaczorowski; Avi Koplovich; Frank Sporer; Michael Wink; Shai Markman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Phenotypic selection on floral traits in an urban landscape.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin; Paige S Warren; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.