Literature DB >> 14762063

Patterns of evolutionary constraints in intronic and intergenic DNA of Drosophila.

Daniel L Halligan1, Adam Eyre-Walker, Peter Andolfatto, Peter D Keightley.   

Abstract

We develop methods to infer levels of evolutionary constraints in the genome by comparing rates of nucleotide substitution in noncoding DNA with rates predicted from rates of synonymous site evolution in adjacent genes or other putatively neutrally evolving sites, while accounting for differences in base composition. We apply the methods to estimate levels of constraint in noncoding DNA of Drosophila. In introns, constraint (the estimated fraction of mutations that are selectively eliminated) is absolute at the 5' and 3' splice junction dinucleotides, and averages 72% in base pairs 3-6 at the 5'-end. Constraint at the 5' base pairs 3-6 is significantly lower in the lineage leading to Drosophila melanogaster than in Drosophila simulans, a finding that agrees with other features of genome evolution in Drosophila and indicates that the effect of selection on intron function has been weaker in the melanogaster lineage. Elsewhere in intron sequences, the rate of nucleotide substitution is significantly higher than at synonymous sites. By using intronic sites outside splice control regions as a putative neutrally evolving standard, constraint in the 500 bp of intergenic DNA upstream and downstream regions of protein-coding genes averages approximately 44%. Although the estimated level of constraint in intergenic regions close to genes is only about one-half of that of amino acid sites, selection against single-nucleotide mutations in intergenic DNA makes a substantial contribution to the mutation load in Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14762063      PMCID: PMC327102          DOI: 10.1101/gr.1329204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  43 in total

1.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome.

Authors:  Robert H Waterston; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Ewan Birney; Jane Rogers; Josep F Abril; Pankaj Agarwal; Richa Agarwala; Rachel Ainscough; Marina Alexandersson; Peter An; Stylianos E Antonarakis; John Attwood; Robert Baertsch; Jonathon Bailey; Karen Barlow; Stephan Beck; Eric Berry; Bruce Birren; Toby Bloom; Peer Bork; Marc Botcherby; Nicolas Bray; Michael R Brent; Daniel G Brown; Stephen D Brown; Carol Bult; John Burton; Jonathan Butler; Robert D Campbell; Piero Carninci; Simon Cawley; Francesca Chiaromonte; Asif T Chinwalla; Deanna M Church; Michele Clamp; Christopher Clee; Francis S Collins; Lisa L Cook; Richard R Copley; Alan Coulson; Olivier Couronne; James Cuff; Val Curwen; Tim Cutts; Mark Daly; Robert David; Joy Davies; Kimberly D Delehaunty; Justin Deri; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Colin Dewey; Nicholas J Dickens; Mark Diekhans; Sheila Dodge; Inna Dubchak; Diane M Dunn; Sean R Eddy; Laura Elnitski; Richard D Emes; Pallavi Eswara; Eduardo Eyras; Adam Felsenfeld; Ginger A Fewell; Paul Flicek; Karen Foley; Wayne N Frankel; Lucinda A Fulton; Robert S Fulton; Terrence S Furey; Diane Gage; Richard A Gibbs; Gustavo Glusman; Sante Gnerre; Nick Goldman; Leo Goodstadt; Darren Grafham; Tina A Graves; Eric D Green; Simon Gregory; Roderic Guigó; Mark Guyer; Ross C Hardison; David Haussler; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; LaDeana W Hillier; Angela Hinrichs; Wratko Hlavina; Timothy Holzer; Fan Hsu; Axin Hua; Tim Hubbard; Adrienne Hunt; Ian Jackson; David B Jaffe; L Steven Johnson; Matthew Jones; Thomas A Jones; Ann Joy; Michael Kamal; Elinor K Karlsson; Donna Karolchik; Arkadiusz Kasprzyk; Jun Kawai; Evan Keibler; Cristyn Kells; W James Kent; Andrew Kirby; Diana L Kolbe; Ian Korf; Raju S Kucherlapati; Edward J Kulbokas; David Kulp; Tom Landers; J P Leger; Steven Leonard; Ivica Letunic; Rosie Levine; Jia Li; Ming Li; Christine Lloyd; Susan Lucas; Bin Ma; Donna R Maglott; Elaine R Mardis; Lucy Matthews; Evan Mauceli; John H Mayer; Megan McCarthy; W Richard McCombie; Stuart McLaren; Kirsten McLay; John D McPherson; Jim Meldrim; Beverley Meredith; Jill P Mesirov; Webb Miller; Tracie L Miner; Emmanuel Mongin; Kate T Montgomery; Michael Morgan; Richard Mott; James C Mullikin; Donna M Muzny; William E Nash; Joanne O Nelson; Michael N Nhan; Robert Nicol; Zemin Ning; Chad Nusbaum; Michael J O'Connor; Yasushi Okazaki; Karen Oliver; Emma Overton-Larty; Lior Pachter; Genís Parra; Kymberlie H Pepin; Jane Peterson; Pavel Pevzner; Robert Plumb; Craig S Pohl; Alex Poliakov; Tracy C Ponce; Chris P Ponting; Simon Potter; Michael Quail; Alexandre Reymond; Bruce A Roe; Krishna M Roskin; Edward M Rubin; Alistair G Rust; Ralph Santos; Victor Sapojnikov; Brian Schultz; Jörg Schultz; Matthias S Schwartz; Scott Schwartz; Carol Scott; Steven Seaman; Steve Searle; Ted Sharpe; Andrew Sheridan; Ratna Shownkeen; Sarah Sims; Jonathan B Singer; Guy Slater; Arian Smit; Douglas R Smith; Brian Spencer; Arne Stabenau; Nicole Stange-Thomann; Charles Sugnet; Mikita Suyama; Glenn Tesler; Johanna Thompson; David Torrents; Evanne Trevaskis; John Tromp; Catherine Ucla; Abel Ureta-Vidal; Jade P Vinson; Andrew C Von Niederhausern; Claire M Wade; Melanie Wall; Ryan J Weber; Robert B Weiss; Michael C Wendl; Anthony P West; Kris Wetterstrand; Raymond Wheeler; Simon Whelan; Jamey Wierzbowski; David Willey; Sophie Williams; Richard K Wilson; Eitan Winter; Kim C Worley; Dudley Wyman; Shan Yang; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Michael C Zody; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Efficient high-throughput resequencing of genomic DNA.

Authors:  Raymond D Miller; Shenghui Duan; Elizabeth G Lovins; Ellen F Kloss; Pui-Yan Kwok
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Neutral substitutions occur at a faster rate in exons than in noncoding DNA in primate genomes.

Authors:  Sankar Subramanian; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence.

Authors:  C F Aquadro; K M Lado; W A Noon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Why genes in pieces?

Authors:  W Gilbert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-02-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  A significant fraction of conserved noncoding DNA in human and mouse consists of predicted matrix attachment regions.

Authors:  Galina V Glazko; Eugene V Koonin; Igor B Rogozin; Svetlana A Shabalina
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Functional constraints and frequency of deleterious mutations in noncoding DNA of rodents.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Daniel J Gaffney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Selection on human genes as revealed by comparisons to chimpanzee cDNA.

Authors:  Ines Hellmann; Sebastian Zollner; Wolfgang Enard; Ingo Ebersberger; Birgit Nickel; Svante Paabo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Covariation in frequencies of substitution, deletion, transposition, and recombination during eutherian evolution.

Authors:  Ross C Hardison; Krishna M Roskin; Shan Yang; Mark Diekhans; W James Kent; Ryan Weber; Laura Elnitski; Jia Li; Michael O'Connor; Diana Kolbe; Scott Schwartz; Terrence S Furey; Simon Whelan; Nick Goldman; Arian Smit; Webb Miller; Francesca Chiaromonte; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Molecular population genetics of Xdh and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.

Authors:  David J Begun; Penn Whitley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  65 in total

1.  Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Helen Borthwick; Carolina Bartolomé; Patricia Pignatelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  MCALIGN: stochastic alignment of noncoding DNA sequences based on an evolutionary model of sequence evolution.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Toby Johnson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Changes in selective effects over time facilitate turnover of enhancer sequences.

Authors:  Kevin Bullaughey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The evolution of antifungal peptides in Drosophila.

Authors:  Francis M Jiggins; Kang-Wook Kim
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison.

Authors:  Daniel L Halligan; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Positive selection on nucleotide substitutions and indels in accessory gland proteins of the Drosophila pseudoobscura subgroup.

Authors:  Sheri Dixon Schully; Michael E Hellberg
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Intron size and exon evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais; Pierre Nouvellet; Peter D Keightley; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes.

Authors:  Erik Axelsson; Matthew T Webster; Nick G C Smith; David W Burt; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Evolutionary constraints in conserved nongenic sequences of mammals.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Gregory V Kryukov; Shamil Sunyaev; Daniel L Halligan; Daniel J Gaffney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Controlling the false-positive rate in multilocus genome scans for selection.

Authors:  Kevin R Thornton; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.