Literature DB >> 14750572

MRI artifact masquerading as orbital disease.

B A Brown1, C E Swallow, A S Eiseman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the diagnostic challenge associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifact and to describe methods of minimizing this artifact.
METHODS: Gadolinium enhancement was demonstrated to be artifact by using an inversion recovery pulse sequence technique.
RESULTS: A patient with complaints of painless loss of vision also had radiologic abnormalities that led to subsequent referral to a tertiary care facility. Increased signals on the fat-suppressed contrast enhanced MRI was demonstrated to be artifact by using an inversion recovery technique which produced a normal MRI of the orbit.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical confusion leading to unnecessary and costly evaluation may be avoided if one considers the possibility of artifact when reviewing magnetic resonance studies. When magnetic susceptibility is suspected, the use of an inversion recovery sequence can better delineate the true nature of the abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 14750572     DOI: 10.1023/b:inte.0000006832.22117.f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  7 in total

1.  Fat-suppression failure artifacts simulating pathology on frequency-selective fat-suppression MR images of the head and neck.

Authors:  Y Anzai; R B Lufkin; B A Jabour; W N Hanafee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts: mechanism and clinical significance.

Authors:  E Pusey; R B Lufkin; R K Brown; M A Solomon; D D Stark; R W Tarr; W N Hanafee
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Mechanisms of contrast in NMR imaging.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; J R MacFall; D Shutts; R Breger; R J Herfkens
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Mascara--an unsuspected cause of magnetic resonance imaging artifact.

Authors:  F W Smith; G A Crosher
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 5.  Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls.

Authors:  E M Delfaut; J Beltran; G Johnson; J Rousseau; X Marchandise; A Cotten
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Frequency-selective fat suppression MR imaging. Localized asymmetric failure of fat suppression mimicking orbital disease.

Authors:  A R Borges; R B Lufkin; A Y Huang; K Farahani; A C Arnold
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Lissac; D Metrop; J Brugirard; J L Coudert; P Pimmel; A Briguet; D Revel; M Amiel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.016

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Beware of artifacts in orbital magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Dandu R Varma; Sandeep Ponnaganti; Rithika V Dandu
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.848

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.