Literature DB >> 6725682

Mechanisms of contrast in NMR imaging.

F W Wehrli, J R MacFall, D Shutts, R Breger, R J Herfkens.   

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance pixel intensity and contrast-to-noise has been computed and presented in graphical form for various tissues in the normal central nervous system, on the assumption that the signal intensity is proportional to the macroscopic transverse spin magnetization at the time of detection. T1, T2, and spin density values were experimentally determined using chi-square minimization techniques. Additionally, spin density was derived from partial saturation scans obtained with a long repetition time compared with the spin-lattice relaxation time. Pulse sequences discussed comprise partial saturation, saturation recovery, spin echo, and Carr- Purcell - Meiboom -Gill ( CPMG ). The complicated dependence of signal and contrast-to-noise on the pulse timing parameters and the specific pulse sequence makes it appear desirable to display image intensity so that the dependence on the extrinsic (operator-selectable parameter) is eliminated. Whereas T2 images can be derived from CPMG scans without excessive time penalty, this is not the case for T1 and spin density.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6725682     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198406000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  15 in total

1.  MRI artifact masquerading as orbital disease.

Authors:  B A Brown; C E Swallow; A S Eiseman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of rodent teeth.

Authors:  O Beuf; M J Seurin; A Briguet; M Lissac
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of normal and pathological white matter maturation.

Authors:  P Baierl; C Förster; H Fendel; M Naegele; U Fink; W Kenn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1988

4.  [Problems and chances of high field magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  M E Ladd; M Bock
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Magnetic resonance microscopy of changes in water content in stems of transpiring plants.

Authors:  G A Johnson; J Brown; P J Kramer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Phase and sensitivity of receiver coils in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; M J Bronskill; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  MR imaging of epidermoid cysts.

Authors:  J Vion-Dury; F Vincentelli; M Jiddane; Y Van Bunnen; C Rumeau; F Grisoli; G Salamon
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Advantage of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cerebral infections.

Authors:  G Schroth; K Kretzschmar; J Gawehn; K Voigt
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Multiparameter MRI assessment of normal-appearing and diseased vertebral bone marrow.

Authors:  Andreas Biffar; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Gerwin P Schmidt; Maximilian F Reiser; Olaf Dietrich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Magnetic resonance relaxation times of normal tissue in the course of chemotherapy: a study in patients with bone sarcoma.

Authors:  H C Holscher; H J van der Woude; J Hermans; M A Nooy; J Doornbos; J L Bloem
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.