Literature DB >> 14746842

Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects.

Tomio Ueno1, Lisa Clark Pickett, Sebastian G de la Fuente, D Curtis Lawson, Theodore N Pappas.   

Abstract

The repair of abdominal wall defects in potentially contaminated or grossly infected fields presents a difficult clinical problem. Polypropylene mesh is relatively contraindicated in these settings because of the potential for chronic infection. The alternatives to polypropylene include polyglactin mesh, which is not associated with chronic infection but is associated with a 100% recurrence of hernia. The ideal prosthetic for this patient group should be resistant to infection and ensure a low rate of hernia recurrence. We studied the use of small intestinal submucosa, which has been reported to be resistant to infection and incorporates into the fascia over 3 to 6 months, in 20 patients with ventral or inguinal hernias (18 ventral, 2 inguinal hernia) in the setting of bacterial contamination. The early postoperative complication rate was 50%. One patient with fasciitis had degradation of the small intestinal submucosa and loss of the bioprosthesis within 7 days. Other early complications included seroma (n=2), ileus (n=1), and wound infection (n=8). No patient experienced chronic infection. Mean follow up was 15.7 months and the rate of recurrence documented by CT or physical examination was 30%. We concluded the following: (1). small intestinal submucosa is an effective alternative bioprosthesis in the management of ventral/inguinal hernia when there is associated bacterial contamination; (2). human vs. pig immune response has not been seen in this patient population; (3). early graft failure due to overwhelming fascial infection was noted in one patient and may be a limitation of this technology in a minority of patients; and (4). early hernia recurrence is relatively low but long-term follow-up has not been completed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14746842     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  25 in total

1.  Use of small intestinal submucosal implants for regeneration of large fascial defects: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  L M Dejardin; S P Arnoczky; R B Clarke
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Polypropylene mesh closure of infected abdominal wounds.

Authors:  J W Jones; G J Jurkovich
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  The Th2-restricted immune response to xenogeneic small intestinal submucosa does not influence systemic protective immunity to viral and bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Amy J Allman; Timothy B McPherson; Lisa C Merrill; Stephen F Badylak; Dennis W Metzger
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2002-02

5.  Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model.

Authors:  S Badylak; K Kokini; B Tullius; B Whitson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 6.  Small intestinal submucosa as a vascular graft: a review.

Authors:  G C Lantz; S F Badylak; M C Hiles; A C Coffey; L A Geddes; K Kokini; G E Sandusky; R J Morff
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.533

7.  Preliminary experience with new bioactive prosthetic material for repair of hernias in infected fields.

Authors:  M E Franklin; J J Gonzalez; R P Michaelson; J L Glass; D A Chock
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2002-10-19       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Definitive surgical treatment of infected or exposed ventral hernia mesh.

Authors:  Steven R Szczerba; Gregory A Dumanian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs.

Authors:  K M Clarke; G C Lantz; S K Salisbury; S F Badylak; M C Hiles; S L Voytik
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  H H Stone; T C Fabian; M L Turkleson; M J Jurkiewicz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  36 in total

1.  Not all biologics are equal!

Authors:  B C Shah; M M Tiwari; M R Goede; M J Eichler; R R Hollins; C L McBride; J S Thompson; D Oleynikov
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Biological mesh reconstruction of perineal wounds following enhanced abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER).

Authors:  Oliver Peacock; H Pandya; T Sharp; N G Hurst; W J Speake; G M Tierney; J N Lund
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The use of Surgisis for abdominal wall reconstruction in the separation of omphalopagus conjoined twins.

Authors:  Roshni Dasgupta; Paul W Wales; Ronald M Zuker; David M Fisher; Jacob C Langer
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Wolfgang B Gaertner; Margaret E Bonsack; John P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Development of novel electrospun absorbable polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds for hernia repair applications.

Authors:  Gregory C Ebersole; Evan G Buettmann; Matthew R MacEwan; Michael E Tang; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Immune response to biologic scaffold materials.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Thomas W Gilbert
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.130

7.  Quantification of DNA in biologic scaffold materials.

Authors:  Thomas W Gilbert; John M Freund; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Transgastric placement of biologic mesh to the anterior abdominal wall.

Authors:  Brent W Miedema; Sharon L Bachman; Emanuel Sporn; J Andrés Astudillo; Klaus Thaler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Biological Implant for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Single Institution Experience and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Elsa Limura; Pasquale Giordano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) in the repair of a cecal wound in unprepared bowel in rats.

Authors:  Tomio Ueno; Atsunori Oga; Toku Takahashi; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.