Literature DB >> 28560512

Biological Implant for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Single Institution Experience and Review of Literature.

Elsa Limura1, Pasquale Giordano2.   

Abstract

AIM: To present our single institution and surgeon's complex abdominal wall reconstructions (CAWR) experience with Permacol™ mesh through a non-randomized study. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: Data of 51 consecutive patients were prospectively collected between 2003 and 2015. Patients had a median of 3 comorbidities (range 0-10) and 68% were Center for Disease Control class II-IV. The mean previous repair was 1.3 (range, 0-12), and 25 (44%) had a mesh in situ. The median defect size was 625 cm2.
RESULTS: Among the 56 CAWR procedures, in 16 (29%) bowel resection/anastomosis was performed. The overall post-operative complication rate was 45%, and it was wound-related except from 1 patient dead for myocardial infarction. One was lost at follow-up. Five were re-operated for recurrence with a second Permacol mesh, leading to 14 (26%) overall recurrences at a mean follow-up of 44 months (range, 4-123). In 33 (59%) cases, fascial closure was achieved. The mesh placement was intraperitoneal in 89%, retro-muscular in 9% and supra-fascial in 1% of cases. A multivariate analysis showed that predictor risk for recurrence was more than 3 previous repairs, wound class III-IV, whereas age, type of comorbidities, defect size and fascial closure did not influence the recurrence. Median post-operative performance status was 0 (range; 0-3). A satisfaction questionnaire was obtained in 43 patients, and 86% of them were satisfied with the outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Biological materials have the potential to reduce morbidity and improve outcome of definitive repair of CAWR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28560512     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4066-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  32 in total

1.  Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Wolfgang B Gaertner; Margaret E Bonsack; John P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study.

Authors:  O M Ramirez; E Ruas; A L Dellon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Tunnelled tensor fascia lata flap for complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Frederick Wang; Samuel Buonocore; Deepak Narayan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-03-08

4.  Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia.

Authors:  N J Slater; A Montgomery; F Berrevoet; A M Carbonell; A Chang; M Franklin; K W Kercher; B J Lammers; E Parra-Davilla; S Roll; S Towfigh; E van Geffen; J Conze; H van Goor
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes?

Authors:  Judy Jin; Michael J Rosen; Jeffrey Blatnik; Michael F McGee; Christina P Williams; Jeffrey Marks; Jeffrey Ponsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Comparison of Synthetic and Biologic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair Using Components Separation Technique.

Authors:  Brinkley K Sandvall; Daniel W Suver; Hakim K Said; David W Mathes; Peter C Neligan; E Patchen Dellinger; Otway Louie
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Abdominal wall reconstruction following severe loss of domain: the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center algorithm.

Authors:  Eduardo D Rodriguez; Rachel Bluebond-Langner; Ronald P Silverman; Grant Bochicchio; Alice Yao; Paul N Manson; Thomas Scalea
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects.

Authors:  Tomio Ueno; Lisa Clark Pickett; Sebastian G de la Fuente; D Curtis Lawson; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with polypropylene mesh: a study using abdominal ultrasound.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener; George B Kazantsev; Shailendra Chopra; Wayne H Schwesinger
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  3 in total

1.  Abdominal Wall Defect Reconstruction with Use of Biological Mesh and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: a Case Report.

Authors:  Savvas Symeonidis; Elissavet Anestiadou; Stefanos Bitsianis; Georgios Gemousakakis; Georgios Ntampakis; Lydia Loutzidou; Nikolaos Ouzounidis; Efstathios Kotidis; Ioannis Mantzoros; Stamatios Angelopoulos
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

Review 2.  Biologic Mesh in Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Selected Outcomes in 51 Studies and 6079 Patients.

Authors:  David J Samson; Mahir Gachabayov; Rifat Latifi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  3D Reconstruction Model of an Extra-Abdominal Desmoid Tumor: A Case Study.

Authors:  Franco Marinozzi; Francesco Carleo; Simone Novelli; Marco Di Martino; Giuseppe Cardillo; Lea Petrella; Fabiano Bini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.