Literature DB >> 1474601

The evolution of coexisting highly divergent LINE-1 subfamilies within the rodent genus Peromyscus.

D H Kass1, F G Berger, W D Dawson.   

Abstract

Two distinct members of the LINE-1 (L1) family in Peromyscus were characterized. The two clones, denoted L1Pm55 and L1Pm62, were 1.5 kb and 1.8 kb in length, respectively, and align to the identical region of the L1 sequence of Mus domesticus. Sequence similarity was on the order of 70% between L1Pm55 and L1Pm62, which approximates that between either Peromyscus sequence and Mus L1. L1Pm62 represents a more prevalent subfamily than L1Pm55. L1Pm62 exists in about 500 copies per haploid genome, while L1Pm55 exists in about 100 copies. The existence of major and minor subpopulations of L1 within Peromyscus is in contrast to murine rodents and higher primates, where L1 copy number is on the order of 20,000 to 100,000, and where levels of intraspecific divergence among L1 elements are typically less than 15-20%. Additional Peromyscus clones are similarly divergent from both L1Pm62 and L1Pm55, implying the existence of more than two distinct L1 subfamilies. The highly divergent L1 subfamilies in Peromyscus apparently have been evolving independently for more than 25 million years, preceding the divergence of cricetine and murine rodents. Investigations of the evolution of L1 within Peromyscus by restriction and Southern analysis was performed using species groups represented by the partially interfertile species pairs P. maniculatus-P. polionotus, P. leucopus-P. gossypinus, and P. truei-P. difficilis of the nominate subgenus and P. californicus of the Haplomylomys subgenus. Changes in L1 and species group taxonomic boundaries frequently coincided. The implications for phylogeny are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1474601     DOI: 10.1007/bf00160208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  41 in total

1.  Comparative study of the L1 family in the genus Mus. Possible role of retroposition and conversion events in its concerted evolution.

Authors:  V Jubier-Maurin; B J Dod; M Bellis; M Piechaczyk; G Roizes
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Subfamily structure and evolution of the human L1 family of repetitive sequences.

Authors:  J Jurka
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Determination of a functional ancestral sequence and definition of the 5' end of A-type mouse L1 elements.

Authors:  W R Shehee; S F Chao; D D Loeb; M B Comer; C A Hutchison; M H Edgell
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  A new family of interspersed repetitive DNA sequences in the mouse genome.

Authors:  W Gebhard; T Meitinger; J Höchtl; H G Zachau
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Pseudogenes as a paradigm of neutral evolution.

Authors:  W H Li; T Gojobori; M Nei
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-07-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An evaluation of the molecular clock hypothesis using mammalian DNA sequences.

Authors:  W H Li; M Tanimura; P M Sharp
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  A transposon-like element in human DNA.

Authors:  K E Paulson; N Deka; C W Schmid; R Misra; C W Schindler; M G Rush; L Kadyk; L Leinwand
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jul 25-31       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Unit-length line-1 transcripts in human teratocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  J Skowronski; T G Fanning; M F Singer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Rat LINE1: the origin and evolution of a family of long interspersed middle repetitive DNA elements.

Authors:  M B Soares; E Schon; A Efstratiadis
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Mys, a family of mammalian transposable elements isolated by phylogenetic screening.

Authors:  H A Wichman; S S Potter; D S Pine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Sep 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Loss of LINE-1 activity in the megabats.

Authors:  Michael A Cantrell; LuAnn Scott; Celeste J Brown; Armando R Martinez; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Two persistent LINE-1 lineages in Peromyscus have unequal rates of evolution.

Authors:  N C Casavant; A N Sherman; H A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Computer simulation of transposable element evolution: random template and strict master models.

Authors:  J E Clough; J A Foster; M Barnett; H A Wichman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Genome organization of repetitive elements in the rodent, Peromyscus leucopus.

Authors:  L L Janecek; J L Longmire; H A Wichman; R J Baker
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Retrotransposon Mys was active during evolution of the Peromyscus leucopus-maniculatus complex.

Authors:  R N Lee; J C Jaskula; R A van den Bussche; R J Baker; H A Wichman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Rapidly evolving repetitive DNAs in a conservative genome: a test of factors that affect chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  R D Bradley; H A Wichman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Shared sequence variants of Mus spretus LINE-1 elements tracing dispersal to within the last 1 million years.

Authors:  N C Casavant; S C Hardies
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Comparison of chromosomal distribution of a retroposon (LINE) and a retrovirus-like element mys in Peromyscus maniculatus and P. leucopus.

Authors:  R J Baker; D H Kass
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.239

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.