Literature DB >> 8576964

Computer simulation of transposable element evolution: random template and strict master models.

J E Clough1, J A Foster, M Barnett, H A Wichman.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that the most extensively studied mammalian retrotransposons replicate by some form of a master template model. This conclusion has been drawn largely from DNA sequence analysis and is based on phylogenetic tree topology, the presence and ordering of shared variants, the degree of divergence between elements within a subfamily, and the shape of the distribution of pairwise differences between elements. To investigate how robust these parameters are as predictors of the model of transposition, computer simulations of the two most extreme transposition models, the Random Template Model and the Strict Master Model, were carried out. A prototype of a computer simulator for studying retrotransposition is presented. The simulator is a versatile digital workbench that maintains DNA sequence data and allows manipulation of a range of factors including reverse transcriptase and in situ mutation rates, transposition template, and transposition rate. All parameters previously used as predictors of the model of transposition were markedly different for the two extreme models when evaluated using large sample sizes of sequences from experiments simulating up to 15 million years of evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8576964     DOI: 10.1007/bf00163211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  18 in total

1.  Master genes in mammalian repetitive DNA amplification.

Authors:  P L Deininger; M A Batzer; C A Hutchison; M H Edgell
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Ribonucleoprotein particles with LINE-1 RNA in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  S L Martin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Retroposons--seeds of evolution.

Authors:  J Brosius
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Systematic identification of LINE-1 repetitive DNA sequence differences having species specificity between Mus spretus and Mus domesticus.

Authors:  B A Rikke; L D Garvin; S C Hardies
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Existence of at least three distinct Alu subfamilies.

Authors:  C Willard; H T Nguyen; C W Schmid
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Rodent L1 evolution has been driven by a single dominant lineage that has repeatedly acquired new transcriptional regulatory sequences.

Authors:  N B Adey; S A Schichman; D K Graham; S N Peterson; M H Edgell; C A Hutchison
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution.

Authors:  W F Doolittle; C Sapienza
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite.

Authors:  L E Orgel; F H Crick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Amplification of the ancient murine Lx family of long interspersed repeated DNA occurred during the murine radiation.

Authors:  A V Furano; B E Hayward; P Chevret; F Catzeflis; K Usdin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Mys, a family of mammalian transposable elements isolated by phylogenetic screening.

Authors:  H A Wichman; S S Potter; D S Pine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Sep 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  Long-term reinfection of the human genome by endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Robert Belshaw; Vini Pereira; Aris Katzourakis; Gillian Talbot; Jan Paces; Austin Burt; Michael Tristem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The evolution of mobile DNAs: when will transposons create phylogenies that look as if there is a master gene?

Authors:  John F Y Brookfield; Louise J Johnson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Two persistent LINE-1 lineages in Peromyscus have unequal rates of evolution.

Authors:  N C Casavant; A N Sherman; H A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Paleogenomic record of the extinction of human endogenous retrovirus ERV9.

Authors:  Paula López-Sánchez; Javier C Costas; Horacio F Naveira
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Genomic demography: a life-history analysis of transposable element evolution.

Authors:  D E Promislow; I K Jordan; J F McDonald
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Molecular evolution of two lineages of L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposons in the california mouse, Peromyscus californicus.

Authors:  N C Casavant; R N Lee; A N Sherman; H A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Reconstructing the evolutionary history of gypsy retrotransposons in the Périgord black truffle (Tuber melanosporum Vittad.).

Authors:  Thibaut Payen; Claude Murat; Francis Martin
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.387

8.  Different rates of LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon amplification and evolution in New World monkeys.

Authors:  Stéphane Boissinot; Christian Roos; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Evolutionary course of CsRn1 long-terminal-repeat retrotransposon and its heterogeneous integrations into the genome of the liver fluke, Clonorchis sinensis.

Authors:  Young-An Bae; Yoon Kong
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.341

10.  Reconstructing the evolutionary history of transposable elements.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Thibaut Payen; Aurélie Hua-Van
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.