Literature DB >> 7981939

Rapidly evolving repetitive DNAs in a conservative genome: a test of factors that affect chromosomal evolution.

R D Bradley1, H A Wichman.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that tandemly repeated DNA sequences may facilitate chromosomal rearrangements was tested by comparing a conservatively evolving karyotype of a bat species (Macrotus waterhousii) with data published for a rapidly evolving karyotype of an equid species (Equus zebra). Empirical data generated from the phylogenetic screening of rapidly evolving repetitive DNAs from approximately 0.1% of the M. waterhousii genome showed only one sequence that was repetitive in M. waterhousii but low in copy number or absent from the outgroup Artibeus jamaicensis. This compares to 34 such clones containing sequences which were repetitive in E. zebra but were low in copy number or absent from the outgroup Ceratotherium simum. The bat sequence represents a single family of repeated sequences, whereas six families of sequences were identified in E. zebra. Southern blot analysis suggested that the sequence from M. waterhousii is interspersed rather than tandemly repeated, as are the sequences in E. zebra. These data support the above hypothesis and suggest that species with conservatively evolving karyotypes have fewer numbers and families of rapidly evolving DNA sequences than do species such as the equids that possess a karyotype that is considered to have undergone rapid karyotypic evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7981939     DOI: 10.1007/BF01552794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  21 in total

Review 1.  The possibility of latent centromeres and a proposed nomenclature system for total chromosome and whole arm translocations.

Authors:  T C Hsu; S Pathak; T R Chen
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1975

2.  Satellite DNA and cytogenetic evolution. DNA quantity, satellite DNA and karyotypic variations in kangaroo rats (genus Dipodomys).

Authors:  F T Hatch; A J Bodner; J A Mazrimas; D H Moore
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  RETROTRANSPOSON MYS IS CONCENTRATED ON THE SEX CHROMOSOMES: IMPLICATIONS FOR COPY NUMBER CONTAINMENT.

Authors:  Robert J Baker; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  FLOW-CYTOMETRIC ANALYSES OF NUCLEAR DNA CONTENT IN FOUR FAMILIES OF NEOTROPICAL BATS.

Authors:  David W Burton; John W Bickham; Hugh H Genoways
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  EFFECTIVE DEME SIZES DURING LONG-TERM EVOLUTION ESTIMATED FROM RATES OF CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENT.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Intragenomic movement and concerted evolution of satellite DNA in Peromyscus: evidence from in situ hybridization.

Authors:  M J Hamilton; G Hong; H A Wichman
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1992

7.  Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals.

Authors:  G L Bush; S M Case; A C Wilson; J L Patton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Fragile sites, telomeric DNA sequences, B chromosomes, and DNA content in raccoon dogs, Nyctereutes procyonoides, with comparative notes on foxes, coyote, wolf, and raccoon.

Authors:  D H Wurster-Hill; O G Ward; B H Davis; J P Park; R K Moyzis; J Meyne
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1988

9.  Mys, a family of mammalian transposable elements isolated by phylogenetic screening.

Authors:  H A Wichman; S S Potter; D S Pine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Sep 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Fragile sites, chromosome evolution, and human neoplasia.

Authors:  R Miró; I C Clemente; C Fuster; J Egozcue
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  8 in total

1.  Interstitial telomeric sites and NORs in Hartmann's zebra (Equus zebra hartmannae) chromosomes.

Authors:  Avni Santani; Terje Raudsepp; Bhanu P Chowdhary
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  FISH mapping of the IGF2 gene in horse and donkey-detection of homoeology with HSA11.

Authors:  T Raudsepp; K Otte; B Rozell; B P Chowdhary
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of repetitive DNA in the Antarctic polyplacophoran Nuttallochiton mirandus.

Authors:  Maria Assunta Biscotti; Marco Barucca; Teresa Capriglione; Gaetano Odierna; Ettore Olmo; Adriana Canapa
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  A novel satellite DNA isolated in Pecten jacobaeus shows high sequence similarity among molluscs.

Authors:  Agnese Petraccioli; Gaetano Odierna; Teresa Capriglione; Marco Barucca; Mariko Forconi; Ettore Olmo; Maria Assunta Biscotti
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Molecular cytogenetic mapping of Cucumis sativus and C. melo using highly repetitive DNA sequences.

Authors:  Dal-Hoe Koo; Young-Woo Nam; Doil Choi; Jae-Wook Bang; Hans de Jong; Yoonkang Hur
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Multidirectional cross-species painting illuminates the history of karyotypic evolution in Perissodactyla.

Authors:  Vladimir A Trifonov; Roscoe Stanyon; Anastasia I Nesterenko; Beiyuan Fu; Polina L Perelman; Patricia C M O'Brien; Gary Stone; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Marlys L Houck; Terence J Robinson; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Gauthier Dobigny; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Zoo-FISH delineates conserved chromosomal segments in horse and man.

Authors:  T Raudsepp; L Frönicke; H Scherthan; I Gustavsson; B P Chowdhary
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Construction of chromosome-specific paints for meta- and submetacentric autosomes and the sex chromosomes in the horse and their use to detect homologous chromosomal segments in the donkey.

Authors:  T Raudsepp; B P Chowdhary
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.620

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.