Literature DB >> 8069462

Comparison of chromosomal distribution of a retroposon (LINE) and a retrovirus-like element mys in Peromyscus maniculatus and P. leucopus.

R J Baker1, D H Kass.   

Abstract

Chromosomal distribution for two interspersed elements (LINEs and mys) that are thought to have established their chromosomal position primarily by transposition was compared between two species of deer mice (Peromyscus leucopus and P. maniculatus). Both LINEs and mys generally produced an autosomal banding pattern reflective of G-bands and both hybridized preferentially to the sex chromosomes. The pattern on the long arm of the X was unique for each, with mys reflecting the G-bands (four bands with the telomeric most prominent) and LINE producing five equally spaced bands of equal intensity. LINE also preferentially hybridized to the short arm of the longest autosomal pair. Some aspects of these patterns are explained adequately with proposed mechanisms that would produce a non-random pattern of chromosomal distribution (i.e. both reflect autosomal G-bands and both preferentially insert into AT-rich regions characteristic of G-bands). However, other aspects such as the differences observed on the long arm of the X do not appear to fit any predictions of proposed mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8069462     DOI: 10.1007/bf01553318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  22 in total

Review 1.  Transposable elements and the evolution of genome organization in mammals.

Authors:  H A Wichman; R A Van den Bussche; M J Hamilton; R J Baker
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Standardized karyotype of deer mice, Peromyscus (Rodentia). The Committee for Standardization of Chromosomes of Peromyscus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1977

3.  Differential distribution of long and short interspersed element sequences in the mouse genome: chromosome karyotyping by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  A L Boyle; S G Ballard; D C Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E Montgomery; B Charlesworth; C H Langley
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  RETROTRANSPOSON MYS IS CONCENTRATED ON THE SEX CHROMOSOMES: IMPLICATIONS FOR COPY NUMBER CONTAINMENT.

Authors:  Robert J Baker; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The sequence of a large L1Md element reveals a tandemly repeated 5' end and several features found in retrotransposons.

Authors:  D D Loeb; R W Padgett; S C Hardies; W R Shehee; M B Comer; M H Edgell; C A Hutchison
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Hybridization of nucleic acids immobilized on solid supports.

Authors:  J Meinkoth; G Wahl
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  The L1Md long interspersed repeat family in the mouse: almost all examples are truncated at one end.

Authors:  C F Voliva; C L Jahn; M B Comer; C A Hutchison; M H Edgell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-12-20       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Mys retrotransposons in Peromyscus leucopus and transgenic Mus musculus.

Authors:  D S Pine; E C Bourekas; S S Potter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Mys, a family of mammalian transposable elements isolated by phylogenetic screening.

Authors:  H A Wichman; S S Potter; D S Pine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Sep 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  The end of the LINE?: lack of recent L1 activity in a group of South American rodents.

Authors:  N C Casavant; L Scott; M A Cantrell; L E Wiggins; R J Baker; H A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic characterization of recent human LINE-1 insertions: evidence supporting random insertion.

Authors:  I Ovchinnikov; A B Troxel; G D Swergold
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  LINE-1 distribution in six rodent genomes follow a species-specific pattern.

Authors:  A Vieira-da-Silva; F Adega; H Guedes-Pinto; R Chaves
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Recent amplification of the kangaroo endogenous retrovirus, KERV, limited to the centromere.

Authors:  Gianni C Ferreri; Judith D Brown; Craig Obergfell; Nathaniel Jue; Caitlin E Finn; Michael J O'Neill; Rachel J O'Neill
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Gypsy, RTE and Mariner transposable elements populate Eyprepocnemis plorans genome.

Authors:  Eugenia E Montiel; Josefa Cabrero; Juan Pedro M Camacho; M Dolores López-León
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Chromosomal distribution of the hamster intracisternal A-particle (IAP) retrotransposons.

Authors:  G Meyer zu Altenschildesche; H Heller; P Wilgenbus; S T Tjia; W Doerfler
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  LINE-1 and SINE-B1 mapping and genome diversification in Proechimys species (Rodentia: Echimyidae).

Authors:  Simone Cardoso Soares; Eduardo Schmidt Eler; Carlos Eduardo Faresin E Silva; Maria Nazareth Ferreira da Silva; Naiara Pereira Araújo; Marta Svartman; Eliana Feldberg
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2022-03-18

8.  X chromosome inactivation and Xist evolution in a rodent lacking LINE-1 activity.

Authors:  Michael A Cantrell; Bryan C Carstens; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparative Genomic In Situ Hybridization and the Possible Role of Retroelements in the Karyotypic Evolution of Three Akodontini Species.

Authors:  Naiara Pereira Araújo; Gustavo Campos Silva Kuhn; Flávia Nunes Vieira; Thaís Queiroz Morcatty; Adriano Pereira Paglia; Marta Svartman
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.326

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.