Literature DB >> 14736301

Using recall to reduce false recognition: diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.

David A Gallo1.   

Abstract

Whether recall of studied words (e.g., parsley, rosemary, thyme) could reduce false recognition of related lures (e.g., basil) was investigated. Subjects studied words from several categories for a final recognition memory test. Half of the subjects were given standard test instructions, and half were instructed to use recall to reduce false recognition. Manipulation checks indicated that the latter instructions did elicit a recall-to-reject strategy. However, false recognition was selectively reduced only when all the words from a category could be recalled (Experiment 1). When longer categories were used, thereby minimizing exhaustive recall, a recall-to-reject strategy was ineffective at reducing false recognition (Experiment 2). It is suggested that exhaustively recalling a category allowed subjects to disqualify the lure as having occurred, analogous to recall-to-reject demonstrations in other tasks. In contrast, partially recalling a category did not help to diagnose the lure as nonstudied. These findings constrain theories of recall-based monitoring processes. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14736301     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  47 in total

1.  The effects of emotional content and aging on false memories.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

3.  Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Lifespan Cognitive Development.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2015-12-01

4.  Metamemorial influences in recognition memory: pictorial encoding reduces conjunction errors.

Authors:  Marianne E Lloyd
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

5.  Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

6.  Memory for Items and Associations: Distinct Representations and Processes in Associative Recognition.

Authors:  Norbou G Buchler; Leah L Light; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Similar phenomena, different mechanisms: semantic and phonological false memories are produced by independent mechanisms.

Authors:  McKenzie R Ballou; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

8.  Are two heuristics better than one? The fluency and distinctiveness heuristics in recognition memory.

Authors:  Marianne E Lloyd; Jeremy K Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

9.  The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; David A Balota; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The role of memory activation in creating false memories of encoding context.

Authors:  Jason Arndt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.