Literature DB >> 24925244

Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: Slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds.

C M Ryan1, S E Lea.   

Abstract

Four experiments investigated the discrimination of images of conspecifics by pigeons; in Experiment 1, chickens were also used as subjects, and images of allospecifics were also used as discriminative stimuli. In Experiment 1, chickens were successfully trained to discriminate slides of pigeons, pictures of one bird being positive stimuli and pictures of another bird being negative; and pigeons were similarly trained to discriminate slides of chickens. However, an attempt to train pigeons to discriminate slides of pigeons only succeeded with one bird out of six. Pigeons were slower to learn chicken slides, and chickens were slower to learn pigeon slides, than chickens were to learn chicken slides in a previous experiment. In Experiment 2, a dishabituation technique was used to demonstrate that pigeons readily discriminate individual live pigeons. In Experiment 3, an attempt was made to test habituation to life-size moving video images of pigeons, but these images did not elicit any natural social responses from the subject pigeons. In Experiment 4 pigeons were trained in a discrimination in which the objects to be discriminated were two different stuffed pigeons. No pigeon learned this discrimination. The experiments give some evidence that chickens are better at discriminating images of individuals than pigeons. No single feature seems to be sufficient for pigeons to discriminate between conspecifics, but the combination of features that is required remains unknown.
Copyright © 1994. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 24925244     DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90064-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  13 in total

1.  Social partner discrimination based on sounds and scents in Asian small-clawed otters (Aonyx cinereus).

Authors:  A Lemasson; M-A Mikus; C Blois-Heulin; T Lodé
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-02-10

2.  Mechanisms of recognition in birds and social Hymenoptera: from detection to information processing.

Authors:  Natacha Rossi; Sébastien Derégnaucourt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A comparative view of face perception.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Domestic pigeons (Columba livia) discriminate between photographs of individual pigeons.

Authors:  Tamo Nakamura; David B Croft; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons.

Authors:  Ulrike Aust; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Pigeons process actor-action configurations more readily than bystander-action configurations.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Discrimination of human faces by archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Yarema Reshitnyk; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The evolution of holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Darren Burke; Danielle Sulikowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-31

9.  Individual recognition in domestic cattle (Bos taurus): evidence from 2D-images of heads from different breeds.

Authors:  Marjorie Coulon; Bertrand L Deputte; Yvan Heyman; Claude Baudoin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Processing of Human Emotional Faces by Pet and Lab Dogs: Evidence for Lateralization and Experience Effects.

Authors:  Anjuli L A Barber; Dania Randi; Corsin A Müller; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.