Literature DB >> 14730384

Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT.

Carlo Bartolozzi1, Francescamaria Donati, Dania Cioni, Carlo Procacci, Giovanni Morana, Antonio Chiesa, Luigi Grazioli, Giorgio Cittadini, Giuseppe Cittadini, Andrea Giovagnoni, Giovanni Gandini, Jochen Maass, Riccardo Lencioni.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT in the detection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Forty-four patients with hepatic colorectal metastases were examined with unenhanced and MnDPDP-enhanced MRI and with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spiral CT. The MR examination protocol included baseline T1-weighted spin-echo (SE), T1-weighted gradient-recalled-echo (GRE), and T2-weighted fast-SE sequences; and T1-weighted SE and T1-weighted GRE sequences obtained 30-60 min after administration of 0.5 micromol/kg (0.5 ml/kg) mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP). Images were interpreted by three blinded readers. Findings at CT and MRI were compared with those at intraoperative US, which were used as term of reference. Intraoperative US detected 128 metastases. In a lesion-by-lesion analysis, the overall detection rate was 71% (91 of 128) for spiral CT, 72% (92 of 128) for unenhanced MRI, and 90% (115 of 128) for MnDPDP-enhanced MRI. MnDPDP-enhanced MRI was more sensitive than either unenhanced MRI ( p<0.0001) or spiral CT ( p=0.0007). In a patient-by-patient analysis, agreement with gold standard was higher for MnDPDP-enhanced MRI (33 of 44 cases) than for spiral CT (22 of 44 cases, p=0.0023) and unenhanced MRI (21 of 44 cases, p=0.0013). MnDPDP-enhanced MRI is superior to unenhanced MRI and spiral CT in the detection of hepatic colorectal metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14730384     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1966-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of action of liver contrast agents: impact for clinical use.

Authors:  O Clément; N Siauve; C A Cuénod; V Vuillemin-Bodaghi; I Leconte; G Frija
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver malignancies: techniques, indications, imaging findings, and clinical results.

Authors:  R Lencioni; D Cioni; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

3.  Survival after percutaneous, image-guided, thermal ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A R Gillams; W R Lees
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Liver resection for colorectal cancer: liver metastases in the aged.

Authors:  M I Brand; T J Saclarides; H D Dobson; K W Millikan
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors: comparison of combined methods of MR imaging with combined methods of CT.

Authors:  H Kondo; M Kanematsu; H Hoshi; T Murakami; T Kim; M Hori; M Matsuo; H Nakamura
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Liver metastases: interventional therapeutic techniques and results, state of the art.

Authors:  T J Vogl; P K Müller; M G Mack; R Straub; K Engelmann; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Efficacy and safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. Multicenter phase III clinical trials. Efficacy of early imaging.

Authors:  M Federle; J Chezmar; D L Rubin; J Weinreb; P Freeny; U P Schmiedl; J J Brown; J A Borrello; J K Lee; R C Semelka; R Mattrey; A H Dachman; S Saini; S E Harms; D G Mitchell; M W Anderson; H H Halford; W F Bennett; S W Young; M Rifkin; S B Gay; R Ballerini; P F Sherwin; R O Robison
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Hepatic tumors: detection and characterization at 1-T MR imaging enhanced with AMI-25.

Authors:  A Denys; L Arrive; V Servois; B Dubray; D Najmark; A Sibert; Y Menu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Liver metastases: safety and efficacy of detection with superparamagnetic iron oxide in MR imaging.

Authors:  M F Bellin; S Zaim; E Auberton; G Sarfati; J J Duron; D Khayat; J Grellet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Detection of colorectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of unenhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T, dual-phase spiral CT, and spiral CT during arterial portography.

Authors:  R Lencioni; F Donati; D Cioni; A Paolicchi; A Cicorelli; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  25 in total

1.  Combining diffusion-weighted MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI improves the detection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  D-M Koh; D J Collins; T Wallace; I Chau; A M Riddell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound improves detection of liver metastases during surgery for primary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ankur J Shah; Mark Callaway; Michael G Thomas; Meg D Finch-Jones
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  MRI of colorectal cancer liver metastases: comparison of orally administered manganese with intravenously administered gadobenate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Torkel B Brismar; Nikolaos Kartalis; Christian Kylander; Nils Albiin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Correlation between calcified liver metastases and histopathology of primary colorectal carcinoma in Chinese.

Authors:  Liying Xu; Yunfeng Zhou; Dasheng Qiu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2010-12-22

Review 5.  [Radiological diagnosis of hepatic tumors. Part II: Identification and differential diagnosis].

Authors:  G Layer; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Diagnostic performance of MDCT, PET/CT and gadoxetic acid (Primovist(®))-enhanced MRI in patients with colorectal liver metastases being considered for hepatic resection: initial experience in a single centre.

Authors:  V O Chan; J P Das; J F Gerstenmaier; J Geoghegan; R G Gibney; C D Collins; S J Skehan; D E Malone
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Higher lesion conspicuity for SENSE dynamic MRI in detecting hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis through the measurements of liver SNR and lesion-liver CNR comparison with conventional dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Osamu Tanaka; Hirotoshi Ito; Kei Yamada; Takao Kubota; Osamu Kizu; Takeharu Kato; Takuji Yamagami; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schima; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Claus Kölblinger; Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini; Andreas Puespoek; Peter Götzinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Palliative surgical management of patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: trends and lessons learned from a large, single institution experience.

Authors:  Peter J Kneuertz; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Sergio Torrez; Nicholas Tapazoglou; Joseph M Herman; Martin A Makary; Frederic Eckhauser; Jingya Wang; Kenzo Hirose; Barish H Edil; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in colorectal liver metastases--comparison with CT and liver MRI.

Authors:  G Kong; C Jackson; D M Koh; V Lewington; B Sharma; G Brown; D Cunningham; G J R Cook
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.