Literature DB >> 16041592

Higher lesion conspicuity for SENSE dynamic MRI in detecting hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis through the measurements of liver SNR and lesion-liver CNR comparison with conventional dynamic MRI.

Osamu Tanaka1, Hirotoshi Ito, Kei Yamada, Takao Kubota, Osamu Kizu, Takeharu Kato, Takuji Yamagami, Tsunehiko Nishimura.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver parenchyma and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between conventional and SENSE dynamic MRI. Thirty-one consecutive patients who were strongly suspected of having HCC were enrolled in our study. The subjects consisted of 20 men and 11 women aged 52 years to 79 years (mean 66.8 years). Dynamic MRI was performed for each patient, with SENSE (SENSE MRI) and without SENSE (conventional MRI) on separate days. For the quantitative analysis, the liver SNR and the lesion-liver CNR of 25 hypervascular HCCs detected on both conventional and SENSE dynamic MRI were measured. The liver SNR of the arterial phase and the portal venous phase was 84.1+/-24.7 and 104.7+/-34.3, respectively, in conventional MRI, while it was 62.9+/-19.5 and 44.5+/-18.2, respectively, in SENSE MRI. SENSE MRI showed a statistically significantly lower SNR than conventional MRI (P<0.01). The lesion-liver CNR was 26.3+/-15.9 in conventional MRI and 39.0+/-19.6 in SENSE MRI. The lesion-liver CNR in SENSE MRI was significantly higher than in conventional MRI (P<0.01). The SNR in SENSE MRI is significantly lower than in conventional MRI, although the lesion CNR is significantly higher than in conventional MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16041592     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2863-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  Dual double arterial phase dynamic MR imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE): which is better for diagnosing hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas, in-phase or opposed-phase imaging?

Authors:  Hiroshi Yoshioka; Jiro Sato; Nobuyuki Takahashi; Douqiang Lou; Masayuki Yamaguchi; Yukihisa Saida; Yuji Itai
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver damage: prospective comparison of detection with dynamic MR imaging and helical CT of the whole liver.

Authors:  Y Yamashita; K Mitsuzaki; T Yi; I Ogata; T Nishiharu; J Urata; M Takahashi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT.

Authors:  T Murakami; T Kim; M Takamura; M Hori; S Takahashi; M P Federle; K Tsuda; K Osuga; S Kawata; H Nakamura; M Kudo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Correlation of three-dimensional gradient echo dynamic MR imaging with CT during hepatic arteriography in patients with hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  K Yoshimitsu; H Honda; M Jimi; T Kuroiwa; H Irie; H Aibe; K Shinozaki; Y Asayama; M Shimada; K Masuda
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Hepatic malignancies: usefulness of acquisition of multiple arterial and portal venous phase images at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  M S Peterson; R L Baron; T Murakami
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Detection of malignant hepatic tumors: comparison of gadolinium-and ferumoxide-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  M Matsuo; M Kanematsu; K Itoh; K Ito; Y Maetani; H Kondo; N Kako; N Matsunaga; H Hoshi; J Shiraishi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Feasibility of application of sensitivity encoding to the breath-hold T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence for evaluation of focal hepatic tumors.

Authors:  Young Kon Kim; Chong Soo Kim; Gyung Ho Chung; Su Bin Jeon; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Preoperative evaluation of malignant liver tumors: comparison of unenhanced and SPIO (Resovist)-enhanced MR imaging with biphasic CTAP and intraoperative US.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Wolfram Schwarz; Stefan Blume; Michael Pietsch; Kohkan Shamsi; Martina Franz; Hartmut Lobeck; Thomas Balzer; Kelly del Tredici; Peter Neuhaus; Roland Felix; Renate M Hammerstingl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT.

Authors:  Carlo Bartolozzi; Francescamaria Donati; Dania Cioni; Carlo Procacci; Giovanni Morana; Antonio Chiesa; Luigi Grazioli; Giorgio Cittadini; Giuseppe Cittadini; Andrea Giovagnoni; Giovanni Gandini; Jochen Maass; Riccardo Lencioni
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MR imaging: value of dynamic and delayed imaging for the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Young Kon Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Chong Soo Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of high- and low-spatial-resolution dynamic MR imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Richard C Semelka; Kensuke Uotani; Koji Sugimoto; Masahiko Fujii; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Enhancement patterns and signal-intensity characteristics of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: pathologic basis and diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  Stavros C Efremidis; Prodromos Hytiroglou; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.