Literature DB >> 21181378

Correlation between calcified liver metastases and histopathology of primary colorectal carcinoma in Chinese.

Liying Xu1, Yunfeng Zhou, Dasheng Qiu.   

Abstract

The study examined the association between calcified liver metastases and the histopathology of the primary colorectal carcinoma in Chinese. The clinical, pathological and CT data were retrospectively analyzed in 210 patients (mean age: 54.2 years) with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Plain CT scanning and contrast-enhanced scanning were performed in all the patients. For the contrast-enhanced examination, iohexol was injected by using a high pressure syringe at a flow rate of 2.5-3.0 mL/s. The arterial phase lasted approximately 25 s and the portal venous phase about 60 s. All patients had no history of chronic liver diseases and had never received interventional treatments. χ(2)-test was used to analyze the rate of calcification in the liver metastasis from colorectal cancer of different differentiation degrees. Among the 210 cases of liver metastases, 22 patients (10.5%) were found to have calcified liver metastases on CT scan. Two patients with calcified liver metastasis received lumpectomy and developed calcification in recurrent tumors. Another two patients had calcification in newly developed tumor masses. And the calcification in the newly developed masses was similar to that of their primary counterparts in terms of morphology and distribution. On the enhanced CT scan, the tumors exhibited no enhancement during hepatic arterial phase and showed slight rim enhancement during portal venous scan in the 22 cases. The calcification became obscure on contrast-enhanced scans. Histopathologically, the primary tumors were well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in 6 cases, moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma in 10, poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma in 4 and mucinous adenocarcinoma in 2 among the 22 cases. No statistical correlation was noted between the incidence of calcified liver metastasis and the pathological subtypes and differentiation degrees of the primary colorectal carcinoma. It was concluded that calcified liver metastases may result from colorectal adenocarcinomata of different differentiation degrees or mucinous adenocarcinomata in Chinese population. There is no correlation between calcification of liver metastases and the pathological subtype of the primary colorectal carcinoma in Chinese, which is different from the findings that calcified metastases were associated with colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma in other ethnic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21181378     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-010-0664-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  26 in total

1.  Detection of colo-rectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of contrast enhanced US, multidetector CT, PET/CT, and 1.5 Tesla MR with extracellular and reticulo-endothelial cell specific contrast agents.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mainenti; Marcello Mancini; Ciro Mainolfi; Luigi Camera; Simone Maurea; Antonietta Manchia; Michela Tanga; Francesco Persico; Pietro Addeo; Dario D'Antonio; Antonio Speranza; Luigi Bucci; Giovanni Persico; Leonardo Pace; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2009-06-27

2.  Liver metastases on serial contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography examinations: was the detection possible on previous examinations?

Authors:  Silvia Tresoldi; Francesco Sardanelli; Irene Borzani; Nicola Flor; Gianpaolo Cornalba
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Detection of liver metastases under 2 cm: comparison of different acquisition protocols in four row multidetector-CT (MDCT).

Authors:  Amina Abdelmoumene; Patrick Chevallier; Marc Chalaron; Frédéric Schneider; Francis R Verdun; Phillipe Frascarolo; Reto Meuli; Pierre Schnyder; Alban Denys
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Performance of imaging modalities in diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irene Floriani; Valter Torri; Eliana Rulli; Daniela Garavaglia; Anna Compagnoni; Luca Salvolini; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Preoperative imaging staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  A H Karantanas; S Yarmenitis; N Papanikolaou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.404

6.  Calcification in colorectal hepatic metastases correlates with longer survival.

Authors:  A M Easson; P T Barron; C Cripps; G Hill; M Guindi; C Michaud
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Liver metastases from colorectal cancer: imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR imaging, computed tomography and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Eli D Rappeport; Annika Loft
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

8.  Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT.

Authors:  Carlo Bartolozzi; Francescamaria Donati; Dania Cioni; Carlo Procacci; Giovanni Morana; Antonio Chiesa; Luigi Grazioli; Giorgio Cittadini; Giuseppe Cittadini; Andrea Giovagnoni; Giovanni Gandini; Jochen Maass; Riccardo Lencioni
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Authors:  K A Paschos; N Bird
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.471

10.  CT of calcified liver metastases in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  H L Hale; J E Husband; K Gossios; A R Norman; D Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Modern imaging of liver metastases].

Authors:  J Breitenseher; M Pones; G Wengert; A Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.