OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the back-up rate on respiratory effort during non-invasive mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: An in vitro study evaluated the inspiratory trigger in seven domiciliary ventilators. Then, a prospective, randomized, crossover trial compared the effect on respiratory effort of three different back-up rates during pressure support (PS) and assist-control/volume-targeted (AC/VT) ventilation. SETTING: A research unit and a tertiary referral pediatric center. PATIENTS: Ten patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). INTERVENTIONS: During the in vivo study, the back-up rate was progressively increased to the maximum that patients could tolerate (Fmax) and respiratory effort, as judged by pressure/time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi/min), was compared between the two ventilatory modes. RESULTS: Differences were observed between trigger pressure, trigger time delay, trigger pressure/time product and the slope between flow and pressure in the seven ventilators. PS and AC/VT ventilation were associated with a decrease in respiratory effort (PTPdi/min was 518+/-172, 271+/-119 and 291+/-138 cmH(2)O. s(-1). min(-1), for spontaneous breathing, PS and AC/VT ventilation, respectively, p=0.05). During the two modes, increasing the back-up rate to Fmax resulted in a greater reduction in PTPdi/min (p=0.001), which was more pronounced during AC/VT ventilation, due to the automatic adjustment of the inspiratory/expiratory time ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the back-up rate during PS and AC/VT ventilation decreases respiratory effort in young patients with CF, but this effect was more marked with AC/VT ventilation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the back-up rate on respiratory effort during non-invasive mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: An in vitro study evaluated the inspiratory trigger in seven domiciliary ventilators. Then, a prospective, randomized, crossover trial compared the effect on respiratory effort of three different back-up rates during pressure support (PS) and assist-control/volume-targeted (AC/VT) ventilation. SETTING: A research unit and a tertiary referral pediatric center. PATIENTS: Ten patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). INTERVENTIONS: During the in vivo study, the back-up rate was progressively increased to the maximum that patients could tolerate (Fmax) and respiratory effort, as judged by pressure/time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi/min), was compared between the two ventilatory modes. RESULTS: Differences were observed between trigger pressure, trigger time delay, trigger pressure/time product and the slope between flow and pressure in the seven ventilators. PS and AC/VT ventilation were associated with a decrease in respiratory effort (PTPdi/min was 518+/-172, 271+/-119 and 291+/-138 cmH(2)O. s(-1). min(-1), for spontaneous breathing, PS and AC/VT ventilation, respectively, p=0.05). During the two modes, increasing the back-up rate to Fmax resulted in a greater reduction in PTPdi/min (p=0.001), which was more pronounced during AC/VT ventilation, due to the automatic adjustment of the inspiratory/expiratory time ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the back-up rate during PS and AC/VT ventilation decreases respiratory effort in young patients with CF, but this effect was more marked with AC/VT ventilation.
Authors: P Aslanian; S El Atrous; D Isabey; E Valente; D Corsi; A Harf; F Lemaire; L Brochard Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nicholas Hart; Michael I Polkey; Annick Clément; Michèle Boulé; John Moxham; Frédéric Lofaso; Brigitte Fauroux Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-02-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Maria L Castro Codesal; Robin Featherstone; Carmen Martinez Carrasco; Sherri L Katz; Elaine Y Chan; Glenda N Bendiak; Fernanda R Almeida; Rochelle Young; Deborah Olmstead; Karen A Waters; Collin Sullivan; Vicki Woolf; Lisa Hartling; Joanna E MacLean Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 2.692