Literature DB >> 11700403

In vivo physiologic comparison of two ventilators used for domiciliary ventilation in children with cystic fibrosis.

B Fauroux1, J Pigeot, M I Polkey, D Isabey, A Clément, F Lofaso.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Home noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is used with increasing frequency for the treatment of patients with respiratory failure caused by cystic fibrosis, yet the optimal mode of ventilation in such children is unknown. We compared the physiologic short-term effects of two ventilators with different modes (one pressure support and the other assist control/volume-targeted [AC/VT]) commonly used for domiciliary ventilation.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover comparison of two ventilators with different modes.
SETTING: Tertiary pediatric university hospital. PATIENTS: Eight children with cystic fibrosis (age, 11-17 yrs) and chronic respiratory failure (pH 7.4 +/- 0.0; PaO2, 57.5 +/- 7.5 torr; PaCO2, 46.1 +/- 2.5 torr), naive to NIMV.
INTERVENTIONS: Two 20-min runs of pressure support and AC/VT ventilation were performed in random order, each run being preceded and followed by 20 mins of spontaneous breathing. MEASUREMENTS: Flow and airway pressure and esophageal and gastric pressures were measured to calculate esophageal (PTPes) and diaphragmatic pressure-time product (PTPdi) and the work of breathing.
RESULTS: The two NIMV sessions significantly improved blood gas variables and increased tidal volume with no change in respiratory rate. Indexes of respiratory effort decreased significantly during the two modes of NIMV compared with spontaneous breathing, with PTPdi/min decreasing from 497.8 +/- 115.4 cm H2O x sec x min(-1) during spontaneous breathing to 127.8 +/- 98.3 cm H2O x sec x min(-1) and 184.3 +/- 79.8 cm H2O x sec x min(-1), during AC/VT and pressure support, respectively (p <.0001), and the work of breathing decreasing from 1.83 +/- 0.12 J.L-1 during spontaneous breathing to 0.48 +/- 0.32 J.L-1 and 0.75 +/- 0.30 J.L-1, during AC/VT and pressure support, respectively (p <.0001). In addition, the effect of AC/VT ventilation was significantly superior to pressure support judged by PTPes and the work of breathing, but this result was explained by three patients who adapted extremely well to the AC/VT ventilation, with the disappearance of ventilator triggering, in effect adopting a controlled mode. There was a correlation between the improvement in PTPdi/min or the work of breathing and patient's subjective impression of comfort during the AC/VT ventilation.
CONCLUSIONS: In awake, stable children with cystic fibrosis, both AC/VT and pressure support unloaded the respiratory muscles. The disappearance of ventilator triggering occurred in a subgroup of patients during AC/VT ventilation, and this explained the good tolerance and the superiority of this mode in the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700403     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200111000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  11 in total

1.  Measurement of diaphragm loading during pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  Brigitte Fauroux; Nicholas Hart; Yuan M Luo; Stephanie MacNeill; John Moxham; Frédéric Lofaso; Michael I Polkey
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Comparison of proportional assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation in chronic respiratory failure due to neuromuscular and chest wall deformity.

Authors:  N Hart; A Hunt; M I Polkey; B Fauroux; F Lofaso; A K Simonds
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Non-invasive ventilation for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Fidelma Moran; Judy M Bradley; Amanda J Piper
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-20

4.  Pressure support versus assisted controlled noninvasive ventilation in neuromuscular disease.

Authors:  Karim Chadda; Bernard Clair; David Orlikowski; Gilles Macadoux; Jean Claude Raphael; Frédéric Lofaso
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Facial side effects during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in children.

Authors:  Brigitte Fauroux; Jean-François Lavis; Frédéric Nicot; Arnaud Picard; Pierre-Yves Boelle; Annick Clément; Marie-Paule Vazquez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Oxygen therapy for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Heather E Elphick; George Mallory
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-25

7.  The effect of back-up rate during non-invasive ventilation in young patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Brigitte Fauroux; Bruno Louis; Nicholas Hart; Sandrine Essouri; Karl Leroux; Annick Clément; Michael Ian Polkey; Frédéric Lofaso
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Physiological effects of noninvasive positive ventilation during acute moderate hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency in children.

Authors:  Sandrine Essouri; Philippe Durand; Laurent Chevret; Vincent Haas; Claire Perot; Annick Clement; Denis Devictor; Brigitte Fauroux
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Speech effects of a speaking valve versus external PEEP in tracheostomized ventilator-dependent neuromuscular patients.

Authors:  Hélène Prigent; Marine Garguilo; Sophie Pascal; Samuel Pouplin; Justine Bouteille; Michèle Lejaille; David Orlikowski; Frédéric Lofaso
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Continuous positive airway pressure titration in infants with severe upper airway obstruction or bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  Sonia Khirani; Adriana Ramirez; Sabrina Aloui; Nicolas Leboulanger; Arnaud Picard; Brigitte Fauroux
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.