Literature DB >> 14726050

Left ventricular pressure and volume unloading during pulsatile versus nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device support.

Stefan Klotz1, Mario C Deng, Joerg Stypmann, Juergen Roetker, Markus J Wilhelm, Dieter Hammel, Hans H Scheld, Christof Schmid.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonpulsatile axial or centrifugal pumps are the latest generation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Whether left ventricular (LV) unloading and outcome in these devices is similar to pulsatile LVADs during long-term support has not been investigated. We compared LV unloading and mortality between different types of LVAD support (pulsatile versus nonpulsatile).
METHODS: In 31 patients undergoing long-term LVAD implantation (nonpulsatile = 10, pulsatile = 21) preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic and hemodynamic assessment with right heart catheterization had been obtained.
RESULTS: All patients had similar echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and clinical heart failure characteristics at baseline. The degree of LV pressure unloading was the same in both device types, caused by similar reduction of mean pulmonary pressure (18.6 +/- 5.1 versus 18.3 +/- 7.5 mm Hg) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (8.9 +/- 4.4 versus 8.0 +/- 7.0 mm Hg). Left ventricular volume unloading was pronounced with a pulsatile device owing to a statistically significant higher pump output (5.1 +/- 1.0 L/min) in comparison with nonpulsatile LVADs (3.6 +/- 0.9 L/min, p < 0.001). Echocardiographic-determined end-systolic indicators confirm this augmentation in pulsatile LVADs. Etiology or the time interval of hemodynamic reassessment had no impact in left ventricular pressure unloading, but LV volume unloading decreased between day 60 and 120 in patients with nonpulsatile LVADs. The preoperative and postoperative transplant mortality was comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular pressure unloading is similar in patients with nonpulsatile as compared with pulsatile implantable long-term assist devices. Left ventricular volume unloading is pronounced in pulsatile LVADs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14726050     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01336-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of continuous and pulsatile left ventricular-assist devices on ventricular unloading using a cardiac electromechanics model.

Authors:  Ki Moo Lim; Jason Constantino; Viatcheslav Gurev; Renjun Zhu; Eun Bo Shim; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 2.  Physiologic and pathologic changes in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ranjit John; Andrew Boyle; Frank Pagani; Leslie Miller
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Reverse cardiac remodeling enabled by mechanical unloading of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Malliaras; John V Terrovitis; Stavros G Drakos; John N Nanas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Bridge to recovery: understanding the disconnect between clinical and biological outcomes.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Optimum control of the Hemopump as a left-ventricular assist device.

Authors:  P He; J Bai; D D Xia
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  In vivo testing of a novel blood pump for short-term extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Nicholas R Teman; David S Demos; Benjamin S Bryner; Bradley Faliks; Emilia M Jahangir; Daniel E Mazur; Alvaro Rojas-Pena; Robert H Bartlett; Jonathan W Haft
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Computational analysis of the importance of flow synchrony for cardiac ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Matthew McCormick; David Nordsletten; Pablo Lamata; Nicolas P Smith
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.589

8.  Left ventricular remodeling and myocardial recovery on mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Marc A Simon; Brian A Primack; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Robert L Kormos; Christian Bermudez; Yoshiya Toyoda; Hemal Shah; John Gorcsan; Dennis M McNamara
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.712

9.  Flow field study comparing design iterations of a 50 cc left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Jason C Nanna; Jennifer A Wivholm; Steven Deutsch; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Living Without a Pulse: The Vascular Implications of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Suneet N Purohit; William K Cornwell; Jay D Pal; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.