Literature DB >> 24769048

Computational analysis of the importance of flow synchrony for cardiac ventricular assist devices.

Matthew McCormick1, David Nordsletten2, Pablo Lamata2, Nicolas P Smith3.   

Abstract

This paper presents a patient customised fluid-solid mechanics model of the left ventricle (LV) supported by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Six simulations were conducted across a range of LVAD flow protocols (constant flow, sinusoidal in-sync and sinusoidal counter-sync with respect to the cardiac cycle) at two different LVAD flow rates selected so that the aortic valve would either open (60mLs(-1)) or remain shut (80mLs(-1)). The simulation results indicate that varying LVAD flow in-sync with the cardiac cycle improves both myocardial unloading and the residence times of blood in the left ventricle. In the simulations, increasing LVAD flow during myocardial contraction and decreasing it during diastole improved the mixing of blood in the LV cavity. Additionally, this flow protocol had the effect of partly homogenising work across the myocardium when the aortic valve did not open, reducing myocardial stress and thereby improving unloading.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular; Computational model; Computer model; Fluid–structure; Tissue mechanics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24769048      PMCID: PMC6217914          DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  22 in total

1.  Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after valve-sparing procedures using a new aortic root conduit.

Authors:  R De Paulis; G M De Matteis; P Nardi; R Scaffa; M M Buratta; L Chiariello
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twentieth official adult heart transplant report--2003.

Authors:  David O Taylor; Leah B Edwards; Paul J Mohacsi; Mark M Boucek; Elbert P Trulock; Berkeley M Keck; Marshall I Hertz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Multiphysics simulation of left ventricular filling dynamics using fluid-structure interaction finite element method.

Authors:  Hiroshi Watanabe; Seiryo Sugiura; Hidenobu Kafuku; Toshiaki Hisada
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  LVAD-induced reverse remodeling: basic and clinical implications for myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Daniel Burkhoff; Stefan Klotz; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Mechanisms of mitral valve motion during diastole.

Authors:  E L Yellin; C Peskin; C Yoran; M Koenigsberg; M Matsumoto; S Laniado; D McQueen; D Shore; R W Frater
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1981-09

6.  An accurate, fast and robust method to generate patient-specific cubic Hermite meshes.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Steven Niederer; David Nordsletten; David C Barber; Ishani Roy; D Rod Hose; Nic Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 7.  Success rates of long-term circulatory assist devices used currently for bridge to heart transplantation.

Authors:  F A Arabia; R G Smith; D S Rose; D A Arzouman; G K Sethi; J G Copeland
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  A clinical study of left ventricular relaxation.

Authors:  Y Hirota
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  A computational method of prediction of the end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship by single beat.

Authors:  Stefan Klotz; Marc L Dickstein; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  W A Zoghbi; K L Farmer; J G Soto; J G Nelson; M A Quinones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  7 in total

1.  A partition of unity approach to fluid mechanics and fluid-structure interaction.

Authors:  Maximilian Balmus; André Massing; Johan Hoffman; Reza Razavi; David A Nordsletten
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.756

Review 2.  Images as drivers of progress in cardiac computational modelling.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Ramón Casero; Valentina Carapella; Steve A Niederer; Martin J Bishop; Jürgen E Schneider; Peter Kohl; Vicente Grau
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 3.  Multiphysics and multiscale modelling, data-model fusion and integration of organ physiology in the clinic: ventricular cardiac mechanics.

Authors:  Radomir Chabiniok; Vicky Y Wang; Myrianthi Hadjicharalambous; Liya Asner; Jack Lee; Maxime Sermesant; Ellen Kuhl; Alistair A Young; Philippe Moireau; Martyn P Nash; Dominique Chapelle; David A Nordsletten
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Validation of a non-conforming monolithic fluid-structure interaction method using phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Andreas Hessenthaler; Oliver Röhrle; David Nordsletten
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Computational Analysis of Intra-Ventricular Flow Pattern Under Partial and Full Support of BJUT-II VAD.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Bin Gao; Yu Chang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-02-27

6.  The Use of Biophysical Flow Models in the Surgical Management of Patients Affected by Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Martina Spazzapan; Priya Sastry; John Dunning; David Nordsletten; Adelaide de Vecchi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Modelling mitral valvular dynamics-current trend and future directions.

Authors:  Hao Gao; Nan Qi; Liuyang Feng; Xingshuang Ma; Mark Danton; Colin Berry; Xiaoyu Luo
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.747

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.