Literature DB >> 14726026

Implementing the ACGME general competencies in a cardiothoracic surgery residency program using 360-degree feedback.

Robert S D Higgins1, Jessica Bridges, James M Burke, Mary Alice O'Donnell, Neri M Cohen, Susan B Wilkes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methods to assess the six competency categories outlined by the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education are essential to allow residency programs to develop reproducible evaluations of their educational curriculum. Current tools to evaluate competencies are insufficient to perform these tasks, particularly in subspecialty disciplines. The key objective of this initiative was to develop and implement an evaluative tool that would provide data to residents and program leadership regarding their performance and to provide the training program with a reliable way to assess this component of the program.
METHODS: Utilizing a highly customized survey tool with a group of cardiothoracic residents, we implemented a 360-degree performance assessment process based on the six Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education competency areas. The full spectrum of associations in a resident's sphere of interaction were surveyed (ie, supervisors, peers, direct reports, nurses, and administrative personnel). Each resident received a comprehensive report that included detailed documentation of the self-evaluation and the average rating of others by category. Each resident also received a transcript of the responses to the open-ended questions and summary of the data highlighting areas of excellence, areas for improvement, and suggested goals and recommendations. The program director received copies of all of these as well as a chart documenting the average scores on each item for the whole cohort.
RESULTS: Each resident met with the 360-degree feedback specialist and the program director to develop and commit to an action plan based on the feedback. The feedback process was repeated approximately 8 months later.
CONCLUSIONS: The 360-degree feedback results provided valuable information for the residents. It also provided our program with a reproducible, quantifiable tool to assess these competencies. Combined with other instruments, the 360-degree feedback was found to be a particularly valuable instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14726026     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  16 in total

1.  Multisource feedback in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Eric J Warm; Daniel Schauer; Brian Revis; James R Boex
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-06

2.  360 Degrees feedback for emergency physicians in Singapore.

Authors:  Kum-Ying Tham
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Assessment methods in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Nadia M Al-Wardy
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2010-07-19

4.  A multirater instrument for the assessment of simulated pediatric crises.

Authors:  Aaron W Calhoun; Megan Boone; Karen H Miller; Rebecca L Taulbee; Vicki L Montgomery; Kimberly Boland
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-03

5.  A systematic review of physician leadership and emotional intelligence.

Authors:  Laura Janine Mintz; James K Stoller
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-03

6.  A randomized, controlled crossover study to discern the value of 360-degree versus traditional, faculty-only evaluation for performance improvement of anesthesiology residents.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berger; Eric Pan; Jason Thomas
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2009-07-01

7.  Feasibility of implementing a standardized multisource feedback program in the graduate medical education environment.

Authors:  Margaret Richmond; Colleen Canavan; Matthew C Holtman; Peter J Katsufrakis
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-12

8.  Impact of a 360-degree professionalism assessment on faculty comfort and skills in feedback delivery.

Authors:  Rachel Stark; Deborah Korenstein; Reena Karani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Feedback With Performance Metric Scorecards Improves Resident Satisfaction but Does Not Impact Clinical Performance.

Authors:  Mira Mamtani; Frances S Shofer; Alexander Sackeim; Lauren Conlon; Kevin Scott; Angela M Mills
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-05-20

10.  Assessment of resident physicians in professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills: a multisource feedback.

Authors:  Bo Qu; Yu-hong Zhao; Bao-zhi Sun
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.