Literature DB >> 15834629

Sample size matters: a guide for surgeons.

Ulrich Guller1, Daniel Oertli.   

Abstract

Considerations of sample size computations in the medical literature have gained increasing importance over the past decade and are now often mandatory for scientific grant proposals, protocols, and publications. However, many surgeons are ill-prepared to understand the parameters on which the appropriate sample size is based. The present article has several objectives: first, to review the need for sample size considerations; second, to explain the ingredients necessary for sample size computations in simple, nonmathematic language; third, to provide options for reducing the sample size if it seems impracticably large; and fourth, to help avoid some of the more common mistakes encountered when computing sample sizes.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15834629     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7921-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

Review 1.  Trials in surgery.

Authors:  R Lilford; D Braunholtz; J Harris; T Gill
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.

Authors:  T V Perneger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18

3.  The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. Survey of 71 "negative" trials.

Authors:  J A Freiman; T C Chalmers; H Smith; R R Kuebler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Inadequate size of 'negative' clinical trials in dermatology.

Authors:  H C Williams; P Seed
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  Sample sizes for prevention trials have been too small.

Authors:  F Ederer; T R Church; J S Mandel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing.

Authors:  G Guyatt; R Jaeschke; N Heddle; D Cook; H Shannon; S Walter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  D Moher; C S Dulberg; G A Wells
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results.

Authors:  S N Goodman; J A Berlin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Sample size: how many patients are necessary?

Authors:  P M Fayers; D Machin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes research based on administrative data: inferior or complementary to prospective randomized clinical trials?

Authors:  Ulrich Guller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) has outcomes similar to those for unilateral TEP: population-based analysis of prospective data of 6,505 patients.

Authors:  Markus Gass; Laura Rosella; Vanessa Banz; Daniel Candinas; Ulrich Güller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Assessment of the bilateral asymmetry of human femurs based on physical, densitometric, and structural rigidity characteristics.

Authors:  Melissa A Pierre; David Zurakowski; Ara Nazarian; Diana A Hauser-Kara; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Revaluation of clopidogrel: let the data speak for themselves.

Authors:  Li Liu; Fandian Zeng; Xiaohua Zeng; Qingmei Xue; Shaoping Nie; Cailian Kang; Jianhong Wu; Qingyun Kang; Xingao Wang; Xiaoqing Liu; Tao Li; Jun Chen; Qing Li; Rong Xu; Xiaoyan Yang; Hui Kang; Fagang Jiang; Zongtao Li; Xuwu Wang; Li Zhang; Yu Long
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17

5.  How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees.

Authors:  Philip F Stahel; Ernest E Moore
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Critical appraisal of meta-analyses: an introductory guide for the practicing surgeon.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Jonathan McCall; Ulrich Güller
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2009-07-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.