Literature DB >> 17384895

Urogynaecological research: current and future developments.

Gunnar Lose1.   

Abstract

The massive introduction of new products from device and drug industries together with a scanty device approval process and a growing scepticism about the reliability of drug trials call for new improved strategies in urogynaecological research. Device companies and physicians have a mutual ethical responsibility of contributing to create clinical data based on the framework of trials in surgery before new surgical products are implemented and disseminated. In respect of the patients' altruism and confidence, which make drug trials possible, the industry and academia have an obligation to conduct and report clinical results in accordance with the highest standards of scientific and ethical integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17384895     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0318-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  17 in total

1.  Medical technology assessment and surgery for stress incontinence.

Authors:  G Lose; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1999

Review 2.  The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: does the evidence support our surgical practice?

Authors:  Mark D Walters
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-12-02

Review 3.  Trials in surgery.

Authors:  R Lilford; D Braunholtz; J Harris; T Gill
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors:  Catherine De Angelis; Jeffrey M Drazen; Frank A Frizelle; Charlotte Haug; John Hoey; Richard Horton; Sheldon Kotzin; Christine Laine; Ana Marusic; A John P M Overbeke; Torben V Schroeder; Hal C Sox; Martin B Van Der Weyden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of research, and role of sponsors in funded studies.

Authors:  Phil B Fontanarosa; Annette Flanagin; Catherine D DeAngelis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Bias in research and conflict of interest: why should we care?

Authors:  H P Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-11-21

8.  Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-11

9.  Efficacy of antimuscarinic therapy for overactive bladder with varying degrees of incontinence severity.

Authors:  J Richard Landis; Steve Kaplan; Steve Swift; Eboo Versi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Principles for strengthening the integrity of clinical research.

Authors:  David Korn; Susan Ehringhaus
Journal:  PLoS Clin Trials       Date:  2006-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  While we wait for a new regulatory framework for surgical mesh.

Authors:  Gunnar Lose; Søren Gräs
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Authors should publish their raw data.

Authors:  Nicolaas J D Nagelkerke; Roos M D Bernsen; Diaa E E Rizk
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.