Literature DB >> 14712115

Advantages and disadvantages of topical packing in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Rakesh K Chandra1, Robert C Kern.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Practices regarding the use of nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery vary widely among surgeons. Recent trends have included the use of various topical, absorbable agents. The purpose of this review is to clarify the rationale for the selection of these products. RECENT
FINDINGS: Although many of these materials have proven to be effective as hemostats, data are conflicting regarding their effect on mucosal healing. Studies in both humans and animals have raised the concern that these agents may be associated with increased scar tissue formation.
SUMMARY: The exact roles for the various available materials are yet to be established. The primary advantage is that they do not require removal, which may improve patient comfort. Currently, however, it does not appear that the use of topical absorbable packing is a substitute for routine postoperative debridement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14712115     DOI: 10.1097/00020840-200402000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1068-9508            Impact factor:   2.064


  13 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  The clinical outcomes of using a new cross-linked hyaluronan gel in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery.

Authors:  Teoman Dal; Seçil Bahar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Different anesthetic agents-soaked sinus packings on pain management after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: which is the most effective?

Authors:  Süheyl Haytoğlu; Gökhan Kuran; Nuray Bayar Muluk; Osman Kürşat Arıkan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Anti-adhesive effect of solid mixture of sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose in murine nasal cavities.

Authors:  Eun Jung Lee; Hye Jin Hwang; Chan Min Jung; Min Ki Kim; Kyung-Su Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Comparative analysis of Cutanplast and Spongostan nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

Authors:  Kyu-Sup Cho; Chan-Hwi Park; Sung-Lyong Hong; Min-Jung Kim; Joo-Yeon Kim; Yong-Wan Kim; Soo-Kweon Koo; Hwan-Jung Roh
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Steering the Clinical Translation of Delivery Systems for Drugs and Health Products.

Authors:  Rosario Pignatello; Pietro Matricardi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  Control of bleeding following functional endoscopic sinus surgery using carboxy-methylated cellulose packing.

Authors:  Konrad G Kastl; Christian S Betz; Vanessa Siedek; Andreas Leunig
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Use of CMC foam sinus dressing in FESS.

Authors:  Kornel Szczygielski; Piotr Rapiejko; Andrzej Wojdas; Dariusz Jurkiewicz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Marco Berlucchi; Paolo Castelnuovo; Andrea Vincenzi; Bruno Morra; Ernesto Pasquini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Nasal packing and stenting.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.