Literature DB >> 26511988

Different anesthetic agents-soaked sinus packings on pain management after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: which is the most effective?

Süheyl Haytoğlu1, Gökhan Kuran1, Nuray Bayar Muluk2,3, Osman Kürşat Arıkan1.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of local anesthetics soaked non-absorbable sinus packs on pain management after functional endoscopic surgery (FESS). One hundred and fifty patients with the diagnosis of bilateral chronic sinusitis with or without nasal polyps who underwent FESS were included into the study. Their pre-operative Lund-Mackay computerized tomography (CT) Scores were similar. We applied anesthetic agents of 2 % lidocaine HCl, 0.25 % Bupivacaine HCl, 0.2 % Ropivacaine, 2 % Prilocaine and 0.9 % NaCl (Saline) in groups 1-5 onto the sinus packs after FESS. At postoperative period, acetaminophen (250 mg/5 ml) was used in 10-15 mg/kg per dose (4 times a day). Bleeding grade, operation duration, postoperative number of gauze/24 h, additional painkiller need, pain values at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h were noted. Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores were also evaluated at 1st, 2nd and 4th weeks postoperatively. In saline group, 93.3 % of the patients needed additional painkiller. Whereas, in Bupivacaine group, additional painkiller use (20.0 %) is less than the other groups. In Bupivacaine group, number of gauze/24 h use was lower than lidocaine, ropivacaine and prilocaine groups. In our study, except 1st and 24th hours, pain values of groups can be written in ascending order (from less to higher) as Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, Prilocaine, Ropivacaine and Saline. In the first hour, pain values of groups can be written in ascending order (from less to higher) as Lidocaine, Prilocaine, Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine and Saline. In the 2nd week, in the Bupivacaine and Lidocaine Groups separately, postoperative Lund-Kennedy scores were lower than the Prilocaine and Saline Groups. In the 1st month, Lidocaine Group's Lund-Kennedy scores were significantly lower than the Saline Group. Synechia values were not different between groups. Bupivacaine help the lower pain values and less additional painkiller need after FESS. Therefore, we recommend to use Bupivacaine soaked sinus packs after FESS for achieve less pain values and to improve patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bupivacaine; Functional endoscopic sinus surgery; Lidocaine; Pain management; Prilocaine; Ropivacaine; Topical anesthetic application

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26511988     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3807-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  19 in total

Review 1.  Packing in endonasal surgery.

Authors:  R Weber; R Keerl; F Hochapfel; W Draf; P H Toffel
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  The Lund-Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: how is it used and what does it predict?

Authors:  Claire Hopkins; John P Browne; Rob Slack; Valerie Lund; Peter Brown
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Effect of lidocaine- and prilocaine-based topical anesthetics on the inflammatory exudates in subcutaneous tissue of rats.

Authors:  Márcia Thaís Pochapski; José Laufer Neto; Jocélia Lago Jassen; Paulo Vitor Farago; Fábio André Santos
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2012

4.  Topical levobupivacaine efficacy in pain control after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Süleyman Yilmaz; Sahnur Yildizbas; Ender Güçlü; Hüseyin Yaman; Gülbin Yalçin Sezen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 5.  Meta-analysis and literature review of techniques to achieve hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Akhil J Khosla; Francisco G Pernas; Patricia A Maeso
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 6.  A scientific review of middle meatal packing/stents.

Authors:  Erik Kent Weitzel; Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2008 May-Jun

7.  Effects of nonabsorbable packing in middle meatus after sinus surgery.

Authors:  Vegard Bugten; Ståle Nordgård; Eirik Skogvoll; Sverre Steinsvåg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Comparison of sodium nitroprusside- and esmolol-induced controlled hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  A P Boezaart; J van der Merwe; A Coetzee
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 9.  Advantages and disadvantages of topical packing in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rakesh K Chandra; Robert C Kern
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Effect of lidocaine-soaked nasal packing on pain relief after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Ji-Hun Mo; Young-Min Park; Young-Jun Chung
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.467

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of glove finger- versus lidocaine-soaked nasal packing after endoscopic nasal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Massimiliano Garzaro; Valeria Dell'Era; Maria Silvia Rosa; Michele Cerasuolo; Giacomo Garzaro; Paolo Aluffi Valletti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shao-Chen Tsai; Ming-Tang Lai; Yi-Lin Kao; Chia-Che Wu
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.