Literature DB >> 18946677

Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study.

Marco Berlucchi1, Paolo Castelnuovo, Andrea Vincenzi, Bruno Morra, Ernesto Pasquini.   

Abstract

Nasal packings can aid in control of postoperative bleeding and healing following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), but traditional non-resorbable stents have several inherent drawbacks. We performed a randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial to assess efficacy of resorbable nasal packing in patients undergoing FESS for chronic rhinosinusitis. A total of 66 patients for 88 nasal cavities were randomized to receive either hyaluronan resorbable packing (MeroGel) or standard non-resorbable nasal dressing after FESS. All underwent preoperative rhinoscopy, CT of sinuses, and, after surgery, were reassessed by rhinoscopy at 2, 4, and 12 weeks in blinded fashion. A total of 44 nasal cavities (MeroGel-group) received resorbable packing, whereas the remaining 44 were packed with non-resorbable nasal dressing. At follow-up endoscopic visit, the presence of nasal synechia was evaluated as primary outcome. Moreover, the tolerability and surgical handling properties of MeroGel and its comfort were assessed by surgeons and patients. Preoperative severity of rhinosinusitis was similar in both groups. No significant adverse events were observed in all patients. Follow-up endoscopy showed a lower proportion of nasal adhesions in MeroGel-group at both 4 (P = 0.041) and 12 weeks (P < 0.001). Moreover, an improvement of other endoscopic nasal findings such as re-epithelialization, presence of granulation tissue, and appearance of nasal mucosa of nasal cavities after FESS was observed in the MeroGel-group. Tolerability and surgical handling properties of MeroGel were positively rated by clinicians and the overall patient judged comfort of MeroGel was favorable. In conclusion, MeroGel can be considered a valid alternative to standard non-resorbable nasal dressings. It is safe, well-accepted, well-tolerated, and has significant advantage of being resorbable. Moreover, it may favor improved healing in patients undergoing FESS and reduce formation of adhesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18946677     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0841-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

1.  [Clinical evaluation of local application of Merogel after endoscopic sinus surgery].

Authors:  Geng Xu; He-xin Chen; Wei-ping Wen; Jian-bo Shi; Yuan Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2003-04

2.  Advances in postoperative care following functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  F A Kuhn; M J Citardi
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  The efficacy of nasal septal surgery.

Authors:  I Samad; H E Stevens; A Maloney
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1992-04

4.  Powered functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  H J Krouse; C M Parker; R Purcell; J H Krouse; D A Christmas
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.676

5.  Mucociliary function following sinus mucosal regeneration.

Authors:  M S Benninger; J L Schmidt; J D Crissman; C Gottlieb
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  A trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of Hyalofill-F in non-healing venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  V Colletta; D Dioguardi; A Di Lonardo; G Maggio; F Torasso
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 7.  Advantages and disadvantages of topical packing in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rakesh K Chandra; Robert C Kern
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Nasal packing after routine nasal surgery--is it justified?

Authors:  M von Schoenberg; P Robinson; R Ryan
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 9.  Functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  R Slack; G Bates
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 3.292

10.  Day-case endoscopic sinus surgery using dissolvable haemostatic nasal packs: a pilot study.

Authors:  P D Karkos; T Thinakararajan; P Goodyear; V R Srinivasan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.236

View more
  29 in total

1.  Comparison between Gelfoam packing and no packing after endoscopic sinus surgery in the same patients.

Authors:  Jee Hye Wee; Chul Hee Lee; Chae Seo Rhee; Jeong-Whun Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Efficacy of hyaluronic acid and hydroxyethyl starch in preventing adhesion following endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Su-Jong Kim; Jae-Min Shin; Eun Jung Lee; Il-Ho Park; Heung-Man Lee; Kyung-Su Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Application of new packing material in endoscopic nasal surgery.

Authors:  Haiying Yin; Fei Han; Zhaoyang Cui
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

4.  The clinical outcomes of using a new cross-linked hyaluronan gel in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery.

Authors:  Teoman Dal; Seçil Bahar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Anti-adhesive effect of solid mixture of sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose in murine nasal cavities.

Authors:  Eun Jung Lee; Hye Jin Hwang; Chan Min Jung; Min Ki Kim; Kyung-Su Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Effects of glove finger- versus lidocaine-soaked nasal packing after endoscopic nasal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Massimiliano Garzaro; Valeria Dell'Era; Maria Silvia Rosa; Michele Cerasuolo; Giacomo Garzaro; Paolo Aluffi Valletti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  The status of the middle turbinate and the risk of sinusitis after endoscopic transnasal sphenoidotomy.

Authors:  Ahmet Emre Süslü; Özden Savaş; Serdar Özer; Metin Önerci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  A Randomized, Multi-Center, Single Blind, Active-Controlled, Matched Pairs Clinical Study to Evaluate Prevention of Adhesion Formation and Safety of HyFence in Patients After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Chul Chang; Sung-Moon Hong; Jin-Hee Cho; Sang Yul Shim; Jung-Sun Cho; Heung-Man Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Hyaluronan in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis.

Authors:  Ettore Cassandro; Giuseppe Chiarella; Matteo Cavaliere; Giulio Sequino; Claudia Cassandro; Sampath Chandra Prasad; Alfonso Scarpa; Maurizio Iemma
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-09-09

10.  Pathologic features and expression of heat shock protein 47 in the nasal mucosa and lacrimal sac: does it influence the surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy?

Authors:  Jinhwan Park; Joonsik Lee; Sehyun Baek
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.