Literature DB >> 14692034

Screening mammography performance and cancer detection among black women and white women in community practice.

Karminder S Gill1, Bonnie C Yankaskas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in mammography screening attendance, black women continue to have poorer prognosis at diagnosis than white woman. Data from the Carolina Mammography Registry were used to evaluate whether there may be differences in mammography performance or detected cancers when comparing black women with white women who are screened by mammography.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from community-based mammography facilities on 468,484 screening mammograms (79,397 in black women and 389,087 in white women) were included for study. Mammograms were linked to a pathology data base for identification of cancers. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and cancer detection rates were compared between black women and white women. Logistic regression methods were used to control for covariates associated with performance characteristics. Differences in cancer characteristics were compared between black women and white women using chi-square statistics.
RESULTS: Screening mammography performance results for black women compared with white women were as follows: sensitivity, odds ratio (OR) = 1.07 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.83-1.39); specificity, OR = 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98-1.06); and positive predictive value, OR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.94-1.23). Among women with no previous screening, black women had a larger proportion of invasive tumors that measured > or = 2 cm (38% vs. 26%; P = 0.04). The cancer detection rate was highest among black women who reported symptoms at screening (13.9 per 1000 black women vs. 7.9 per 1000 white women). Invasive cancers in black women were poorer grade (P = 0.001), and more often had negative estrogen receptor status and progesterone receptor status (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, screening mammography performed equally well in black women and white women controlling for age, breast density, and time since previous mammogram. Black women who reported symptoms had larger and higher grade tumors compared with white women. Educational efforts need to be strengthened to encourage black women to react sooner to symptoms, so that the tumors detected will be smaller and black women will have a better prognosis when they appear for mammography. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14692034     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

1.  "What does this mean?" How Web-based consumer health information fails to support information seeking in the pursuit of informed consent for screening test decisions.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Burkell; D Grant Campbell
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-07

2.  Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?

Authors:  Julie M Kapp; Rod Walker; Sebastien Haneuse; Diana S M Buist; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Transition from film to digital mammography: impact for breast cancer screening through the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Lisanne van Lier; Clyde B Schechter; Donatus U Ekwueme; Janet Royalty; Jacqueline W Miller; Aimee M Near; Kathleen A Cronin; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Racial differences in false-positive mammogram rates: results from the ACRIN Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST).

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Philip Yamartino; Jianing Yang; Mirar Bristol; Emily F Conant; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Performance of digital screening mammography among older women in the United States.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Ellen S O'Meara; Dejana Braithwaite; Tracy Onega
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in female breast cancer: screening rates and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Franco Sassi; Harold S Luft; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The influence of race, ethnicity, and individual socioeconomic factors on breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Mahasin Mujahid; Kendra Schwartz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Barbara Salem; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  An assessment of the quality of mammography care at facilities treating medically vulnerable populations.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Goldman; Sebastien J-P A Haneuse; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Bonnie Yankaskas; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Race/ethnicity and breast cancer estrogen receptor status: impact of class, missing data, and modeling assumptions.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; James H Ware; Afamia Kaddour
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Using Simulation Modeling to Inform Strategies to Reduce Breast Cancer Mortality in Black Women in the District of Columbia.

Authors:  Aimee M Near; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Clyde B Schechter; Michael A Stoto
Journal:  Epidemiol Res Int       Date:  2012-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.