Literature DB >> 26125419

Racial differences in false-positive mammogram rates: results from the ACRIN Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST).

Anne Marie McCarthy1, Philip Yamartino, Jianing Yang, Mirar Bristol, Emily F Conant, Katrina Armstrong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality, but false-positive tests are common. Few studies have assessed racial differences in false-positive rates.
OBJECTIVES: We compared false-positive mammography rates for black and white women, and the effect of patient and facility characteristics on false positives. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
SUBJECTS: A prospective cohort study. From a sample of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST), we identified black/African American (N=3176) or white (N=26,446) women with no prior breast surgery or breast cancer. MEASURES: Race, demographics, and breast cancer risk factors were self-reported. Results of initial digital and film mammograms were assessed. False positives were defined as a positive mammogram (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0, 4, 5) with no cancer diagnosis within 15 months.
RESULTS: The false-positive rate for digital mammograms was 9.2% for black women compared with 7.8% for white women (P=0.009). After adjusting for age, black women had 17% increased odds of false-positive digital mammogram compared with whites (OR=1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.35; P=0.033). This association was attenuated after adjusting for patient factors, prior films, and study site (OR=1.04; 95% CI, 0.91-1.20; P=0.561). There was no difference in the occurrence of false positives by race for film mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: Black women had higher frequency of false-positive digital mammograms explained by lack of prior films and study site.The variation in the disparity between the established technique (film) and the new technology (digital) raises the possibility that racial differences in screening quality may be greatest for new technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26125419      PMCID: PMC4503517          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  47 in total

1.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine A Gatsonis; Martin J Yaffe; R Edward Hendrick; Anna N A Tosteson; Dennis G Fryback; Lawrence W Bassett; Janet K Baum; Emily F Conant; Roberta A Jong; Murray Rebner; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Kristi L Allgood; Steve Whitman; Emily Conant
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Technology diffusion, hospital variation, and racial disparities among elderly Medicare beneficiaries: 1989-2000.

Authors:  Peter W Groeneveld; Sara B Laufer; Alan M Garber
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Goldman; Rod Walker; Diana L Miglioretti; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; And Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Diagnostic mammography performance and race: outcomes in Black and White women.

Authors:  Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karminder S Gill
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Mortality after acute myocardial infarction in hospitals that disproportionately treat black patients.

Authors:  Jonathan Skinner; Amitabh Chandra; Douglas Staiger; Julie Lee; Mark McClellan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Assessing health care use and cost consequences of a new screening modality: the case of digital mammography.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard; Tracy L Onega; Weiwei Zhu; Diana S M Buist; Paul Fishman; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Effects of digital mammography uptake on downstream breast-related care among older women.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Weiwei Zhu; Tracy L Onega; Paul Fishman; Louise M Henderson; Anna N A Tosteson; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  3 in total

1.  Health Care Segregation, Physician Recommendation, and Racial Disparities in BRCA1/2 Testing Among Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Mirar Bristol; Susan M Domchek; Peter W Groeneveld; Younji Kim; U Nkiru Motanya; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Leveraging system sciences methods in clinical trial evaluation: An example concerning African American women diagnosed with breast cancer via the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study.

Authors:  Yamilé Molina; Aditya Khanna; Karriem S Watson; Dana Villines; Nyahne Bergeron; Shaila Strayhorn; Desmona Strahan; Abigail Skwara; Michael Cronin; Prashanthinie Mohan; Surrey Walton; Tianxiu Wang; John A Schneider; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-07-19

3.  Breast cancer survival disparity between African American and Caucasian women in Arkansas: A race-by-grade analysis.

Authors:  Behjatolah Monzavi-Karbassi; Eric R Siegel; Srikanth Medarametla; Issam Makhoul; Thomas Kieber-Emmons
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.967

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.