Literature DB >> 23914301

Using Simulation Modeling to Inform Strategies to Reduce Breast Cancer Mortality in Black Women in the District of Columbia.

Aimee M Near1, Jeanne S Mandelblatt, Clyde B Schechter, Michael A Stoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Black women in the District of Columbia (DC) have the highest breast cancer mortality in the US. Local cancer control planners are interested in how to most efficiently reduce this mortality.
METHODS: An established simulation model was adapted to reflect the experiences of Black women in DC and estimate the past and future impact of changes in use of screening and adjuvant treatment.
RESULTS: The model estimates that the observed reduction in mortality that occurred from 1975 to 2007 attributable to screening, treatment, and both was 20.2%, 25.7%, and 41.0% respectively. The results suggest that, by 2020, breast cancer mortality among Black women in DC could be reduced by 6% more by initiating screening at age 40 vs. age 50. Screening annually may also reduce mortality to a greater extent than biennially, albeit with a marked increase in false positive screening rates.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates how modeling can provide data to assist local planners as they consider different cancer control policies based on their individual populations.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23914301      PMCID: PMC3731168          DOI: 10.1155/2012/241340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Res Int        ISSN: 2090-2980


  21 in total

1.  Trends in use of adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States: 1975-1999.

Authors:  Angela Mariotto; Eric J Feuer; Linda C Harlan; Lap-Ming Wun; Karen A Johnson; Jeffrey Abrams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Binbing Yu; Martin Krapcho; Diana L Miglioretti; Michael P Fay; Grant Izmirlian; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Berta M Geller; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening in Australia.

Authors:  R Carter; P Glasziou; G van Oortmarssen; H de Koning; C Stevenson; G Salkeld; R Boer
Journal:  Aust J Public Health       Date:  1993-03

5.  Dissemination of adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States using estrogen receptor information: 1975-1999.

Authors:  Angela B Mariotto; Eric J Feuer; Linda C Harlan; Jeffrey Abrams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2006

6.  The SPECTRUM population model of the impact of screening and treatment on U.S. breast cancer trends from 1975 to 2000: principles and practice of the model methods.

Authors:  Jeanne Mandelblatt; Clyde B Schechter; William Lawrence; Bin Yi; Jennifer Cullen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2006

7.  Race-specific impact of natural history, mammography screening, and adjuvant treatment on breast cancer mortality rates in the United States.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Clyde B Schechter; Aimee M Near; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Michael A Stoto; Gerrit Draisma; Harry J de Koning; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Reduction in breast cancer mortality due to the introduction of mass screening in The Netherlands: comparison with the United Kingdom.

Authors:  E van den Akker-van Marle; H de Koning; R Boer; P van der Maas
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  A model-based prediction of the impact on reduction in mortality by a breast cancer screening programme in the city of Florence, Italy.

Authors:  E Paci; R Boer; M Zappa; H J de Koning; G J van Oortmarssen; E Crocetti; D Giorgi; M Rosselli del Turco; J D Habbema
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  3 in total

1.  Improving Breast Cancer Outcomes Through Patient Navigation.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Introduction to the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Breast Cancer Models.

Authors:  Oguzhan Alagoz; Donald A Berry; Harry J de Koning; Eric J Feuer; Sandra J Lee; Sylvia K Plevritis; Clyde B Schechter; Natasha K Stout; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Structure, Function, and Applications of the Georgetown-Einstein (GE) Breast Cancer Simulation Model.

Authors:  Clyde B Schechter; Aimee M Near; Jinani Jayasekera; Young Chandler; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.